Who’s #1? (Merged) | Page 7 | The Boneyard

Who’s #1? (Merged)

Joined
Dec 2, 2018
Messages
869
Reaction Score
5,312
It's interesting that the NCAA is basing seeding for the tournament on NET rankings, when they haven't published any since April.
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2011
Messages
7,976
Reaction Score
26,804
This early in the season, I have zero problem with UCLA being #1. Now if West Virginia would have been #1...heck I would not mind either! Just more pressure and being under the microscope for UCLA. Let them deal with that stuff right now. UConn and South Carolina have been there and done that. Time for these other programs to get a taste of the pressure.
 

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,891
Reaction Score
72,688
It's interesting that the NCAA is basing seeding for the tournament on NET rankings, when they haven't published any since April.
Why would they need to publish any NET rankings between April and November?
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
3,751
Reaction Score
18,251
When discussing rankings remember 1997-1998 TN had 10 losses entering the NCAA Tournament and then ran off 6 straight wins to win the title!
So early rankings mean little, it's who is healthy and playing well entering the NCAA's that matters most!
LSU was hot and healthy when they won!
 
Joined
May 30, 2020
Messages
1,396
Reaction Score
4,923
It's interesting that the NCAA is basing seeding for the tournament on NET rankings, when they haven't published any since April.
Before the conference realignments, it took about 15 games to get any semblance of statistical accuracy to the NET rankings. Now it will be about 20 games to gain enough history to be reliable, which means about 2-3 weeks before conference tournaments, and that is why so many changes occur between NCAA committee "top sixteen reveals."

Historically, the first NET calculation occurs around the 10 - 12 games played point (about Christmas break time).
 
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
964
Reaction Score
4,766
Before the conference realignments, it took about 15 games to get any semblance of statistical accuracy to the NET rankings. Now it will be about 20 games to gain enough history to be reliable, which means about 2-3 weeks before conference tournaments, and that is why so many changes occur between NCAA committee "top sixteen reveals."

Historically, the first NET calculation occurs around the 10 - 12 games played point (about Christmas break time).
Massey is a hot mess this year. It’s probably a combination of realignment, transfers/graduations and the number of games played, but it doesn’t seem close.
 

Online statistics

Members online
334
Guests online
4,327
Total visitors
4,661

Forum statistics

Threads
162,476
Messages
4,311,755
Members
10,135
Latest member
Lafayette


.
..
Top Bottom