Why would they need to publish any NET rankings between April and November?It's interesting that the NCAA is basing seeding for the tournament on NET rankings, when they haven't published any since April.
Before the conference realignments, it took about 15 games to get any semblance of statistical accuracy to the NET rankings. Now it will be about 20 games to gain enough history to be reliable, which means about 2-3 weeks before conference tournaments, and that is why so many changes occur between NCAA committee "top sixteen reveals."It's interesting that the NCAA is basing seeding for the tournament on NET rankings, when they haven't published any since April.
Massey is a hot mess this year. It’s probably a combination of realignment, transfers/graduations and the number of games played, but it doesn’t seem close.Before the conference realignments, it took about 15 games to get any semblance of statistical accuracy to the NET rankings. Now it will be about 20 games to gain enough history to be reliable, which means about 2-3 weeks before conference tournaments, and that is why so many changes occur between NCAA committee "top sixteen reveals."
Historically, the first NET calculation occurs around the 10 - 12 games played point (about Christmas break time).