But until the school actually admits it and takes some action to correct the record, and to the best of my knowledge they haven't, there isn't much the NCAA can do. Because, again, they don't decide what class is bogus and what class is legitimate. Just ot give an example, not at UNC or even a D1 school, but Wesleyan, a fine, highly respected liberal arts school ran a class on pornography I htink in th ewomens studies department, maybe it was sociology, I don't recall the details. It became something of an issue a few years back because one of the assignments required students to either make a flick or write a pornographic story or do a photo shoot, something along those lines. Wesleyan maintained that it was a perfectly legitimate subject for academic study, the professor was highly qualified in the field (sociology or womens studies or something, not pornography) and it likely was/is, and that the curriculum was rigorous. It was just the subject matter that was "squicky" though they didn't use that term. I believe the course is still offered though they have modified the requirements somewhat and changed the title for political and fundraising reasons. But I can imagine some NCAA guy with a newly minted degree from Ouachtia Baptist College or BYU or Anna Maria College being sent to investigate and raising all kinds of stink based on subject not quality. That is the "slippery slope" you start down when you start having the NCAA rule on the quality of specific courses.
