Where does UConn go from here? | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Where does UConn go from here?

It would be really nice if Oregon State and/or Washington State filed an anti-trust case against the Big 10, ACC and Big 12. We could use someone else being the plaintiff other than UConn.
Another interesting case would be a Title 9 violation. Women's sports is getting the short shrift in realignment.
 
Miami, FL State, Clemson, UVA, UNC will be gone. UConn the joins the ACC possibly with Temple and a couple others.
 
Miami, FL State, Clemson, UVA, UNC will be gone. UConn the joins the ACC possibly with Temple and a couple others.

10 years out, a lot could change. Between now and then, basketball is going to generate most of the revenue, but football needs a schedule and some way to get broadcast. That is what UConn needs in the short term.
 
10 years out, a lot could change. Between now and then, basketball is going to generate most of the revenue, but football needs a schedule and some way to get broadcast. That is what UConn needs in the short term.
Football also needs to be ranked in the top 30 or better soon. We need a way to get there.
 
.-.
I'm probably alone in this, but I think UConn should drop football, effective immediately, and be loud about it. Don't be sheepish, get out in front of it. Say the quiet part out loud: College football is a mugs game, designed to fill the pockets of the 10 or 15 programs (and their coaches) at the top at the expense of everyone else. It's exploitative and actually causes long-term physical harm to student athletes (ask the kid who was stretchered off last night from N.C. State). Participating in this charade is embarrassing, but we're being offered an off ramp and we should take it. We'll (hopefully) continue to win NCs in the sports we compete in and our women's volleyball players won't have to drag themselves to Stillwater, Oklahoma on Tuesday night.
 
I'm probably alone in this, but I think UConn should drop football, effective immediately, and be loud about it.

lmao at thinking this is an unpopular opinion, half of UConn fans blame the football team for the Big East breaking up which is just about the dumbest thing I ever heard but anyway it probably doesn't help that a huge part of the fan base actually resents the football team
 
lmao at thinking this is an unpopular opinion, half of UConn fans blame the football team for the Big East breaking up which is just about the dumbest thing I ever heard but anyway it probably doesn't help that a huge part of the fan base actually resents the football team
Football drives the bus!
 
I'm probably alone in this, but I think UConn should drop football, effective immediately, and be loud about it. Don't be sheepish, get out in front of it. Say the quiet part out loud: College football is a mugs game, designed to fill the pockets of the 10 or 15 programs (and their coaches) at the top at the expense of everyone else. It's exploitative and actually causes long-term physical harm to student athletes (ask the kid who was stretchered off last night from N.C. State). Participating in this charade is embarrassing, but we're being offered an off ramp and we should take it. We'll (hopefully) continue to win NCs in the sports we compete in and our women's volleyball players won't have to drag themselves to Stillwater, Oklahoma on Tuesday night.
This strategy is right up there with being a leader with not playing the 2020 season! We got a great rep from that so I could definitely see your plan working out well ......Thank you for your interest in UConn football
 
UConn is doing what it needs to do to position itself for now and the future:

1) invest in facilities and branding

2) win in the Big East and Hockey East

3) develop football schedules with games that will interest fans

4) improve football play
And none of it will be good enough to get invited to anything sadly :(
 
Come on - that first part is simply a ridiculous statement. You are correct on the second. Casual UConn fans are only fully invested when the team is good, especially March.

UConn basketball is not bigger than the Yankees, Mets, BoSox, Giants, and Pats in any way shape or form. Sure, UConn hoops may have a greater overall interest than say the Jets, Nets, and Islanders but even the Celtics, Knicks, and Rangers have far more impact and loyloyalty a larger number of people in CT.

Yes, UConn basketball is the heart and soul of "Connecticut pride" (its the only National brand the State has with the Whalers gone), but it doesn't bump MLB and NFL as a investment in time, $$$, and loyalty for the most sports fans in the CT.
Connecticut is just like Hawaii!
 
.-.
Football drives the bus!

Subscribers drive the bus.

One thing we need to root for is Syracuse and BCU to turn into athletic wastelands, and honestly, Syracuse University starting to have enrollment issues wouldn't hurt either. The ACCN getting dumped from basic cable in New York is a good start.
 
What a patently absurd statement. The freaking Jets are more "in the blood of CT residents" than UConn basketball? Sure thing.

Up until the last few years, you could probably make the argument for Yankees/Sox being above UConn hoop... but no way for the NFL.
You are correct about Uconn’s fanbase
UConn has had a significant following in basketball since the Hugh Greer era
industrial Connecticut ,when i was younger probably had the best sports fans in the country.UConn came to the attention of this 11 year old sports junkie when they upset Holy Cross (a then national power)on their home floor giving HC their first home lose in 47 games . That was a big deal as that team went on to win The NiT then an honor on par. with the 16 team NCAA. There is nothing like success to capture a state and win we certainly did . Taking the Yankee Conference 12 times in 13 year period from 1948-1060 appearing in 7 NCAA tourneys then a tournament of conference champions. We again won 6 more from 1963-1970. When the Yankee Conference lost its auto-bid we briefly were in a loose group of Eastern Independents call the ECAC winning 2 titles in the mid !970 and their auto-bid
That was the precursor
to the Big East and A10
So when we joined the Big East we already had a huge fan base and a history of winning that appealed to Dave Gavitt
The guys in my group by1979 all were long time UConn fans and despite less than great teams the crowds were pretty large
Calhoun took the job for three reasons
!. He didn’t want to leave New England
2. He was well aware of Connecticuts huge fanbase and Connecticuts passion for the sport.
3. The Big East had become the premier basketball league in the country filled with iconic coaches . He wanted to play against the best.
Prior to the Big East being a UConn fan was mainly a radio thing with channel 8 ’s few live broadcasts a big event.
The ESPN rise of basketball broadcasts mirrored the Big East rise . then suddenly the reality of TV broadcasts of every game was beyond our wildest dreams

Historical Footnote
Why UConn didn't”t become a National Power earlier is rooted in the demise of Eastern basketball in general
Our first foe in the infamous 1950 NCAA tourney was single digit lose to St Johns at Msg and their great coach
Frank McGuire . After the scandals top eastern coaches departed for less soiled pastures like North Carolina as did the top talent . Using a lineup that a few years earlier would have looked like the great CCNY teams he brought that hick school its first NC beating Wilt and Kansas in three OT’s
in a game i listened to with a pillow muffling the sound as it ended well past my bed time.
Without an understanding of the bleak years of staying local you really can’t understand Dave Gavitt’s dream of returning Eastern Basketball to its rightful position on the national stage.
So no offense to Iowa but other than Nebraska we got the best fans in the country.
 
Subscribers drive the bus.

One thing we need to root for is Syracuse and BCU to turn into athletic wastelands, and honestly, Syracuse University starting to have enrollment issues wouldn't hurt either. The ACCN getting dumped from basic cable in New York is a good start.
Funny you say that. I’m in central MA with charter. We’re currently not getting ESPN due to negotiations. Just noticed this morning. Says Disney tried to up the rates but Charter has my back and is looking out for my best interest.

I’m sure my bill will be lower for the missing channels too.
 
Funny you say that. I’m in central MA with charter. We’re currently not getting ESPN due to negotiations. Just noticed this morning. Says Disney tried to up the rates but Charter has my back and is looking out for my best interest.

I’m sure my bill will be lower for the missing channels too.
What Charter charges me every month should be constituted as theft. I just can’t seem to cut the cord. This might finally be it though - a few channels I tend to watch are now blocked and somehow they’ll find a way to raise their prices. Think I’m finally done with them.
 
lmao at thinking this is an unpopular opinion, half of UConn fans blame the football team for the Big East breaking up which is just about the dumbest thing I ever heard but anyway it probably doesn't help that a huge part of the fan base actually resents the football team
I'm defo out of the loop, not living in CT and not visiting message boards a lot. The whole thing is humiliating, and it doesn't need to be. From what I can tell UConn is doing quite well as an institution of higher education (record applications and enrollment for their latest incoming class?). I know that's not important on a message board like this and generally secondary to athletic success, but it's kind of the whole reason for it's existence. To be this thirsty for Alabama or Michigan's table scraps is just sad. For 99.9% of its history college football has been a "competition" that isn't a competition at all. It's the only big time sport in America where you can literally win all your games and NOT get a chance to compete for a championship. Half or more of the teams start the season with ZERO chance to win the competition they're taking part in. They have to follow all the same rules; offer a certain number of scholarships, maintain facilities, pay for coaches and other staff all while having no guaranteed access to a playoff. I can't imagine why anyone would agree to this deal, except for the prestige by proximity maybe?
 
.-.
We'll have to stay in the one dimensional conference for a while longer. But, on the terms accepted by the new ACC members (especially SMU), I am glad we didn't have that decision. It would be hard to stomach being an indentured servant to the unproductive schlumps from BC and Syracuse. That effort is a finger in the dike. It essentially puts the ACC's unequal distribution deal on the backs of the new members for a lengthy period of time. At least we have the dignity of not playing that BS game. Subsidizing the weak sisters of the ACC will grow old for sure, but for us it's a non- starter.
 
Football drives the bus!
Just because they drive the bus it doesn’t mean they aren’t destroying the business. Look back in history at all the companies that thought they were in control and had it all. This will not end well, I guarantee it. I may be dead but save my Joe Namath post. I for one have cut the chord and am happy watching what I want. SEC football it ain’t I’ll stick with the NFL
 


Here are a few things we can pass along.


Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark talked up UConn’s appeal, not the other way around. There were quiet conversations between UConn and the ACC, during a period before enough conference presidents softened their opposition to West Coast additions. UConn’s interest in the Big 12 and the ACC were no secret, but the school’s hierarchy keeps these things low profile.
Why? A big media blitz would not impress a prospective power conference, and only antagonize the Big East, the conference in which UConn resides. Why SMU and not UConn? SMU, according to reports, has agreed to wait nine years before collecting its TV revenue. With its massive backing from Texas oil and gas interests, SMU can afford to accept those terms. UConn would be nuts to go for something like that.
 


Here are a few things we can pass along.


Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark talked up UConn’s appeal, not the other way around. There were quiet conversations between UConn and the ACC, during a period before enough conference presidents softened their opposition to West Coast additions. UConn’s interest in the Big 12 and the ACC were no secret, but the school’s hierarchy keeps these things low profile.
Why? A big media blitz would not impress a prospective power conference, and only antagonize the Big East, the conference in which UConn resides. Why SMU and not UConn? SMU, according to reports, has agreed to wait nine years before collecting its TV revenue. With its massive backing from Texas oil and gas interests, SMU can afford to accept those terms. UConn would be nuts to go for something like that.
Look- we have been talking- we work on quiet
 


Here are a few things we can pass along.


Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark talked up UConn’s appeal, not the other way around. There were quiet conversations between UConn and the ACC, during a period before enough conference presidents softened their opposition to West Coast additions. UConn’s interest in the Big 12 and the ACC were no secret, but the school’s hierarchy keeps these things low profile.
Why? A big media blitz would not impress a prospective power conference, and only antagonize the Big East, the conference in which UConn resides. Why SMU and not UConn? SMU, according to reports, has agreed to wait nine years before collecting its TV revenue. With its massive backing from Texas oil and gas interests, SMU can afford to accept those terms. UConn would be nuts to go for something like that.
SMU is getting the same money they would be getting in the AAC, so they don't need any additional money to move conferences from these magical oil and gas people or whatever. Anyone saying that they are getting massive backing to make the move is probably not in the loop in any way.
 
SMU is getting the same money they would be getting in the AAC, so they don't need any additional money to move conferences from these magical oil and gas people or whatever. Anyone saying that they are getting massive backing to make the move is probably not in the loop in any way.
It's probably more money than what they are getting from the AAC.
 
.-.
We wait for 3 or 4 schools to leave the ACC. Then we are taken as a replacement. Until then, the Big East is adequate. It will be questionable at that point if the ACC will be a "power" conference, but it's where we belong.
 
We wait for 3 or 4 schools to leave the ACC. Then we are taken as a replacement. Until then, the Big East is adequate. It will be questionable at that point if the ACC will be a "power" conference, but it's where we belong.

The "3 teams leaving the ACC" is wishcasting for something that is legally impossible. The only way the ACC will come apart before 2036 would take so many things to happen as to not be worth discussing.
 
The "3 teams leaving the ACC" is wishcasting for something that is legally impossible. The only way the ACC will come apart before 2036 would take so many things to happen as to not be worth discussing.
Right now, I'm most interested in what Oregon State and Washington State do. They've said no to Aresco. Reverse merger with the MWC? Threaten lawsuit to keep P5 status if they do?
 
The "3 teams leaving the ACC" is wishcasting for something that is legally impossible. The only way the ACC will come apart before 2036 would take so many things to happen as to not be worth discussing.
I meant in 2036. 13 long years away.
 
I'm defo out of the loop, not living in CT and not visiting message boards a lot. The whole thing is humiliating, and it doesn't need to be. From what I can tell UConn is doing quite well as an institution of higher education (record applications and enrollment for their latest incoming class?). I know that's not important on a message board like this and generally secondary to athletic success, but it's kind of the whole reason for it's existence. To be this thirsty for Alabama or Michigan's table scraps is just sad. For 99.9% of its history college football has been a "competition" that isn't a competition at all. It's the only big time sport in America where you can literally win all your games and NOT get a chance to compete for a championship. Half or more of the teams start the season with ZERO chance to win the competition they're taking part in. They have to follow all the same rules; offer a certain number of scholarships, maintain facilities, pay for coaches and other staff all while having no guaranteed access to a playoff. I can't imagine why anyone would agree to this deal, except for the prestige by proximity maybe?
Good points. However, we are all very aware of how well UConn is doing academically and the importance of its academic rep. CR has made us aware of the importance of potentially being invited to the AAU. It's probably the main reason Stanford and Berkeley are joining the ACC. It's much easier to be optimistic about UConn's future when it continues to be a top rated university.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,359
Messages
4,567,615
Members
10,469
Latest member
xxBlueChips


Top Bottom