Good one there. First team without the generally acclaimed top superstar and the first to not win any conference titles and still go on to take the NC. All 8 are special and I refuse to love any of my children more than another.I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but this championship is the only one that UCONN has not had the best player in the country. Its for that reason that I consider the 2013 championship the best one of all.
Arguably didn't in 2000 either. Catchings was. A starting lineup that included Bird, Cash, Shea, and Svet was sick, however.I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but this championship is the only one that UCONN has not had the best player in the country. Its for that reason that I consider the 2013 championship the best one of all.
Arguably didn't in 2000 either. Catchings was. A starting lineup that included Bird, Cash, Shea, and Svet was sick, however.
True we didn't have a generally acclaimed superstar, but that's only because of the 32C BS. No doubt in my mind that KML is a superstar.Good one there. First team without the generally acclaimed top superstar and the first to not win any conference titles and still go on to take the NC. All 8 are special and I refuse to love any of my children more than another.
True we didn't have a generally acclaimed superstar, but that's only because of the 32C BS. No doubt in my mind that KML is a superstar.
Alex, what if you rate the season by the emotional satisfaction of its outcome.
Simply as an emotional response to the team's journey to the championship this is probably my favorite.
Well okay, if we want to start getting technical about voting over the absolutely top player, then Alana Beard in 2004 also was considered by some awards services to be the top player in DT's injury-limited final year. So Catchings who took all of 6 shots in the NC game was selected the top player in 2000 for a team that lost by 19 points. That's hardly a "top player" credential. And even if Sveta and Shea were not selected as the top player, the difference would have been seen as negligible to nonexistent in a stack-up vs. Catchings.Arguably didn't in 2000 either. Catchings was. A starting lineup that included Bird, Cash, Shea, and Svet was sick, however.
Beard over Taurasi was a joke. Catchings has been a credit to WBB at every level she's played and was worthy as NPOY. Uconn just completely out-scouted, out-worked, and out-classed the LVs in the NC game. Between the Kelly Schumacher block party and the tsunami of backdoor cuts, it was a freaking ambush. Tamika Williams and Asjha Jones even got a little scrappy with the LVs. They didn't know what hit them.Well okay, if we want to start getting technical about voting over the absolutely top player, then Alana Beard in 2004 also was considered by some awards services to be the top player in DT's injury-limited final year. So Catchings who took all of 6 shots in the NC game was selected the top player in 2000 for a team that lost by 19 points. That's hardly a "top player" credential. And even if Sveta and Shea were not selected as the top player, the difference would have been seen as negligible to nonexistent in a stack-up vs. Catchings.
But to be fair, Stewie and KML were playing at a Shea and Sveta level for the last 5 games of this season, so maybe UConn did have the superstars for the real part of the season anyway.
Not sure that many of us here in 2004 thought Beard's selection was a joke, but the problem was she did have the numbers over DT, and there were even comments from outside sources that DT won the Naismith and Lieberman awards on reputation over the Wade-winning Beard. DT had way more tools than Beard, but a lot of them were worn down through injuries during the season that saw her team enter the tourney as a #2 seed while Beard's Duke team was a #1 seed. Much like Catchings having great numbers in 2000 as one of the top players, Beard had the overall best stats in 2004.Beard over Taurasi was a joke. Catchings has been a credit to WBB at every level she's played and was worthy as NPOY. Uconn just completely out-scouted, out-worked, and out-classed the LVs in the NC game. Between the Kelly Schumacher block party and the tsunami of backdoor cuts, it was a freaking ambush. Tamika Williams and Asjha Jones even got a little scrappy with the LVs. They didn't know what hit them.
Oh, I'll turn into a pumpkin again and go fulltime back to writing about running after the NC high starts to fade in a few weeks. But April is my favorite time of year, especially since it starts with one the most perfect days of the year.Dobbs glad to see you posting frequently the last few days.
Not sure that many of us here in 2004 thought Beard's selection was a joke, but the problem was she did have the numbers over DT, and there were even comments from outside sources that DT won the Naismith and Lieberman awards on reputation over the Wade-winning Beard. DT had way more tools than Beard, but a lot of them were worn down through injuries during the season that saw her team enter the tourney as a #2 seed while Beard's Duke team was a #1 seed. Much like Catchings having great numbers in 2000 as one of the top players, Beard had the overall best stats in 2004.
Beard was a tremendous player. She (and her teammates) didn't get it done in the postseason, no doubt about it. But she was a tremendou player. Any award that was supposed to reflect the totality of the season should have gone to DT. Any award that was only supposed to reflect the regular season should have gone to Beard.Not sure that many of us here in 2004 thought Beard's selection was a joke, but the problem was she did have the numbers over DT, and there were even comments from outside sources that DT won the Naismith and Lieberman awards on reputation over the Wade-winning Beard. DT had way more tools than Beard, but a lot of them were worn down through injuries during the season that saw her team enter the tourney as a #2 seed while Beard's Duke team was a #1 seed. Much like Catchings having great numbers in 2000 as one of the top players, Beard had the overall best stats in 2004.
You'd have to ask the voters for the national awards as to their criteria, but it's clear that for many of the players selected for the first-second-etc. teams at the national level that stats have been an often overriding consideration. It is a judgment call, and most voters have not seen all of the players play. It's easier to go off of the easy stats even if the player is a largely immobile hulk who collects a bunch of boards and gets fed for a ton of shots and FTs. You can say Yada-Yada player makes her team better in intangible ways, but voters have a tough time quantifying the intangibles.Is the NPOY just who has the best stats? Because that's not really taking into account the ridiculous beatings Taurasi took over her final year (both years really). And the fact that she was able to bull through those injuries and still will that team to a championship, is another feather in her cap.