When will recruiting improve? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

When will recruiting improve?

While we all know about Randy's diamonds, to boil it down to a few key areas:

i) on offense I think pulling in Pindell (over Temple), Washington (no way the last administration pulls him in), and Krajewski has the potential to prove recruiting has improved. We need to see them play to confirm. The potential is there however. Also, on Oline last year's staff had no chance at Robert Holmes, nor would they likely had been able to bring in someone like Ofori-Nyadu (IMO).

ii) On defense not sure we would have pulled in Eli Thomas or even Travis Jones (although he seemed like a homestate lean no matter what). Last year the new staff got TJ Gardner (BC flip) late in the process and Caleb Thomas. All these kids need to play to make a judgement however.

The new staff also brought Jay Rose back to UConn as well. Not sure the old staff had a real chance to do that.

If we finish strong (so to speak) on the last few slots for this class (some RBs and DL help), then perhaps the sum will suggest things have improved....never really know until they play however.

As long as Krajewski, Pindell, and Washington don't end up as backup tight ends, it'll be a big uptick in QB recruitment from what we're used to
 
The star system is a joke. 3 star,kids get bumped to 4 when Alabama or Michigan recruit them and get demoted when they commit to schools like UCONN. I think whaler said it best, the best way to evaluate any sort of recruit is to see what schools have offered him.
 
The star system is a joke. 3 star,kids get bumped to 4 when Alabama or Michigan recruit them and get demoted when they commit to schools like UCONN. I think whaler said it best, the best way to evaluate any sort of recruit is to see what schools have offered him.

Absolutely right. I remember when Harbaugh stole Ulizio from us as a recruit, his Rivals ranking immediately went up a star. While the stars definitely have meaning in the aggregate, you have to take them with grains of salt...
 
UConn football recruiting desperately needs UConn football wins and in the immortal words of Bill Murray, "That's a fact Jack!". Uconn has a huge strike against them just getting out of the gate as far as recruiting goes and that is the extremely small recruiting pool in New England. And, of that pool a portion that can actually compete at the D-1 level will never play for the Huskies. Why? Because their parents and/or grandparents went to and may have played for other schools so family legacy will Trump a degree from UConn. Nothing you can do about that. So what do you do? Recruit outside of your region and hope you can find players that have football blood in their veins but didn't put up good enough numbers to catch the eye of the big boys. That's the crap shoot UConn has been in since they decided to go D-1. Edsall left because he didn't think it could get done here and Maryland whispered B1G in his ear. Now he's back starting from scratch again in a league that this time is actually devoted to football as much as any sport. So in a way that's a plus over the old Big East. But...this time around it isn't about building a D-IAA team into a D-1 team. It's all about building a D-1 team into a top 25 team because that's the only way your going to be able to tap into that group of New England kids pondering a ranked Husky team over their parents Alma mater. Or stealing kids from NJ and PA from the clutches of Penn St, Notre Dame and the ACC. The longer UConn can hang onto Lashlee and Crocker(yes, this guy is another "Mind", hang onto him) the better. Good luck Randy.
 
UConn football recruiting desperately needs UConn football wins and in the immortal words of Bill Murray, "That's a fact Jack!". Uconn has a huge strike against them just getting out of the gate as far as recruiting goes and that is the extremely small recruiting pool in New England. And, of that pool a portion that can actually compete at the D-1 level will never play for the Huskies. Why? Because their parents and/or grandparents went to and may have played for other schools so family legacy will Trump a degree from UConn. Nothing you can do about that. So what do you do? Recruit outside of your region and hope you can find players that have football blood in their veins but didn't put up good enough numbers to catch the eye of the big boys. That's the crap shoot UConn has been in since they decided to go D-1. Edsall left because he didn't think it could get done here and Maryland whispered B1G in his ear. Now he's back starting from scratch again in a league that this time is actually devoted to football as much as any sport. So in a way that's a plus over the old Big East. But...this time around it isn't about building a D-IAA team into a D-1 team. It's all about building a D-1 team into a top 25 team because that's the only way your going to be able to tap into that group of New England kids pondering a ranked Husky team over their parents Alma mater. Or stealing kids from NJ and PA from the clutches of Penn St, Notre Dame and the ACC. The longer UConn can hang onto Lashlee and Crocker(yes, this guy is another "Mind", hang onto him) the better. Good luck Randy.

You do know if you hit enter it creates paragraph's.
 
.-.
*paragraphs
;)
Don't you just love it when an individual corrects another upon the proper usage of the language or structure and in that lecture screws up themselves?
Maybe someone should "coach up" this "expert" in that area
Not talking about you WingU-Conn - I am commenting about the person to whom you were correcting
 
Don't you just love it when an individual corrects another upon the proper usage of the language or structure and in that lecture screws up themselves?
Maybe someone should "coach up" this "expert" in that area
Not talking about you WingU-Conn - I am commenting about the person to whom you were correcting

Maybe you should lighten up Francis. I promise you my gaffe was much easier to read than the Spackler epic post.
 
It's possible for RE2, Lashlee and Crocker to get 2, 3 and 4 star kids locally (CT, New England, NY, NJ, PA) but it is critical that UCONN keep it's academic ranking near the top. Many kids and their parents will factor that into their final decision. Those Republican cuts to UConn would be disastrous to the football program and to recruiting in football, basketball, soccer, women's basketball and baseball.
Academic budget cuts would have had no impact on UNC’s fake class.
 
According to Rivals, we have 3 AAC teams in the top 40 for 2018 so far (Cincy, UCF, USF). There's no reason that we cannot be a top 40 recruiting school even in the AAC, although I understand your point that it makes life tougher to do so.
Generally agree...but those 3 schools are in talent rich areas. UConn's location will always make it challenging to be top 40 in recruiting.
 
Generally agree...but those 3 schools are in talent rich areas. UConn's location will always make it challenging to be top 40 in recruiting.

They are in talent rich areas where they are, AT BEST, the 4th choice school. Seriously, I'm not making that up.

In Ohio, the first three choices would be OSU, Notre Dame, and Michigan (probably in that order). One would also argue that Penn State, Wisconsin, etc., also come first.
In Florida, the first choices would be FSU, Florida, and Miami (possibly in that order). One would also argue that LSU, Alabama, Georgia, etc., come first.

In some ways, a kid from Mass or New Hampshire in the 3-star prospect range perhaps has more incentive to come to UConn than an Ohio 3-star prospect has to go to Cincy. In this comparison, region matters very little...
 
Don't you just love it when an individual corrects another upon the proper usage of the language or structure and in that lecture screws up themselves?
Maybe someone should "coach up" this "expert" in that area
Not talking about you WingU-Conn - I am commenting about the person to whom you were correcting
Nobodies perfect.

(see what I did there)
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,250
Messages
4,559,919
Members
10,448
Latest member
MillerLitEd


Top Bottom