Seems to have a hard time landing top ten recruits since the Paris sisters - good but not outstanding recruits - wonder if Norman is a harder sale than Storrs, at least Storrs has NYC, Boston, and ESPN within a few hours..
I may have missed the exception here and there, but it seems that every time I look at the Top 25, Oklahoma is somewhere around 15. Is Sherri Coale ever going to achieve the heights she seemed destined for 10 years ago?
Top recruits look at who played there before and where they are playing now.........Most OK players are no better when they leave than when they arrived......How many OK players are playing in Europe or the WNBA?.........That is your answer .... Sherri needs to revamp her coaching style and bring in some better coaches like Shea to help develop some attitude ...
First, in general, posters in this thread seem to be comparing OK and Coale to UConn and Geno. Instead, how about comparing her to her peers. She's had top 20 success virtually year in and out - sometimes better and rarely worse. In the real world, she's done fine. And Jim Foster - has outcoached a lot of folks. He had his weaknesses, but I want to point out that both Coale and Foster have been head coaches for USA Basketball teams with great success.Two years in a row I saw Coale outcoached in tight games by Jim Foster. When that happened the second time, I realized she's just not a very good game coach. If Jim Foster has your number on the Xs and Os, you've got a problem.
I probably shouldn't have "replied" specifically to your post. But I didn't agree with your premise that Foster is a bad X and O coach - or that X's and O's define Coale's issues. More generally, while I agree one could (always) hope for more, I'm not truly of the opinion that she hasn't been successful, or needs to be more successful to define herself as a top coach. Or would be considered that way by most fans of most programs.I'm not sure what I'm getting bashed for here, in that I responded to the original question and not your subsequent revision. Be that as it may, I did exactly what you suggested, compared her to a peer in Foster, and found her coming up short. So what's the problem?