What We Learned from Bay-Tenn

[UConnCat]

[quote="UConnCat, post: 96118] If UConn's games against Duke, OK and UNC were played in Nov and Dec with games against Baylor, Stanford and A&M, I suspect there would be less "discussion" of cupcakes.

Doubtful. The debate was never about schedule strength. It was always about criticizing UConn, regardless of validity. No circumstance or facts are ever going to change people who do that. No point in arguing.[/quote]

Yeah, you're right.

 

[EricLA]

Was just looking up the SOS from last year... and TAMU was #1, Duke was #2, and UCONN was actually #3. But anyway... UCONN's SOS should never be questioned.... its always among the top along with TENN.

not sure which one you looked at but UCONN was #1 on the ones i saw. or maybe it was RPI and not SOS. either way, you are right, we were up there with you guys...

 

[triaddukefan]

not sure which one you looked at but UCONN was #1 on the ones i saw. or maybe it was RPI and not SOS. either way, you are right, we were up there with you guys...

collegerpi.com But yeah.... last years schedule was very very tough.... Xavier, TAMU, and Kentucky all at Cameron... plus Temple, BYU, Charlotte, James Madison, Ok State... and of course UCONN. Good mix of BCS and Mid Majors.

 

[speedoo]

[quote="UConnCat, post: 96118] If UConn's games against Duke, OK and UNC were played in Nov and Dec with games against Baylor, Stanford and A&M, I suspect there would be less "discussion" of cupcakes.

Doubtful. The debate was never about schedule strength. It was always about criticizing UConn, regardless of validity. No circumstance or facts are ever going to change people who do that. No point in arguing.[/quote]
Exactly. And the people who make those invalid criticisms are not worth reading, listening to, and certainly not having discussions with.