- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 1,144
- Reaction Score
- 2,158
Let me start by saying I've always liked Skylar's game. And yes, she surely dismantled UConn in last year's Final Four.
But when everyone started talking about her as a PoY candidate, I was taken aback. And it wasn't just this board. Somehow it had become accepted wisdom that Skylar was one of a handful of the best players in the country. Surely a first team AA.
Didn't compute for me. Didn't come close to computing.
Consider some of her stats last year: 43.2% FG shooting (not very good), 1.25 points per shot (good but not spectacular), 14.5 points per 30 minutes (again, good but not spectacular) and most importantly an assist-to-turnover ratio of 1.2, which is frankly not good at all for a point guard. Those are not even close to the numbers you would expect from a first team AA. And, although she had two great games against UConn and Tennessee, she didn't even have that spectacular of an NCAA tournament overall. For example she had 35 assists but 34 turnovers.
And then something happened.
I have no idea what it was, but her numbers this year are absolutely off the charts ... and bear no resemblance to last year.
52.3% FG shooting (vs. 43.2%). 1.48 points per shot!! (vs. 1.25). 18.9 points per 30 minutes (vs. 14.5). A/TO 1.9 (vs. 1.2). 3.4 steals per game (v 2.0).
Yes, this is early season competition and she didn't have a great game against Baylor. But still!! Her numbers are up dramatically across the board.
So, yeah, I'm ready to say that Skylar is first team AA caliber (Oddyssey Sims probably is as well, and I'm not prepared to say Skylar is better, but she's at least first team AA caliber.)
But my real question is, what the heck happened? For those of you who were touting Skylar, were you overlooking that she really wasn't a great player last year (except for two big games), or were you assuming that those two games were the beginning of a transformation? Or is there something I'm missing?
But when everyone started talking about her as a PoY candidate, I was taken aback. And it wasn't just this board. Somehow it had become accepted wisdom that Skylar was one of a handful of the best players in the country. Surely a first team AA.
Didn't compute for me. Didn't come close to computing.
Consider some of her stats last year: 43.2% FG shooting (not very good), 1.25 points per shot (good but not spectacular), 14.5 points per 30 minutes (again, good but not spectacular) and most importantly an assist-to-turnover ratio of 1.2, which is frankly not good at all for a point guard. Those are not even close to the numbers you would expect from a first team AA. And, although she had two great games against UConn and Tennessee, she didn't even have that spectacular of an NCAA tournament overall. For example she had 35 assists but 34 turnovers.
And then something happened.
I have no idea what it was, but her numbers this year are absolutely off the charts ... and bear no resemblance to last year.
52.3% FG shooting (vs. 43.2%). 1.48 points per shot!! (vs. 1.25). 18.9 points per 30 minutes (vs. 14.5). A/TO 1.9 (vs. 1.2). 3.4 steals per game (v 2.0).
Yes, this is early season competition and she didn't have a great game against Baylor. But still!! Her numbers are up dramatically across the board.
So, yeah, I'm ready to say that Skylar is first team AA caliber (Oddyssey Sims probably is as well, and I'm not prepared to say Skylar is better, but she's at least first team AA caliber.)
But my real question is, what the heck happened? For those of you who were touting Skylar, were you overlooking that she really wasn't a great player last year (except for two big games), or were you assuming that those two games were the beginning of a transformation? Or is there something I'm missing?