Looks like it. It's a very complicated business and they should be receiving 1099s for all of their contract incomeDo college athletes have to pay a percentage of their NIL for away games? Is it more beneficial for them to play away games in states such as Texas or Florida without state income taxes? Or is NIL not affected by where games are played?
If they don't now they will soon. I don't see any way NIL can be defended as not being earned as a participant in the games they play (even if they may miss some games). At some point every tax state will want their share.Do college athletes have to pay a percentage of their NIL for away games? Is it more beneficial for them to play away games in states such as Texas or Florida without state income taxes? Or is NIL not affected by where games are played?
Think this was a topic a while back, and I believe the consensus was these kids might have a rude tax awakening down the road. Penalties interest and the initial amountIf they don't now they will soon. I don't see any way NIL can be defended as not being earned as a participant in the games they play (even if they may miss some games). At some point every tax state will want their share.
Makes sense. There can be a large tax bill for states with income tax.
I'd be doing the same if I were those schools.
Especially as Berkeley is either a love it or hate it environment.The Cal Berkeley one is a bit odd.
I am an accountant. Income earned in a state is taxable in that state. Some states have a $ requirement but all pro athletes would surely exceed that limit. And, yes, that means pro athletes need to file tax returns in every state in which they earn income.Not quite 35 years ago (spring 1991) I read about California imposing state income tax on visiting baseball players (I'm an accountant, I have to read crap like that). The atate of California, going after major league baseball was what led to all professional athletes having to have taxes imposed by multiple states. California unwittingly hurt themselves on this however as while the were able to collect income tax from players on teams from other states as a percentage of games those teams played in California, they lost the ability to collect taxes on the games their teams played outside of California (50% of every team's ganes are on the road. Only five teams are located in California).
What they initial thought would be a revenue windfall ended up being basically revenue neutral, while creating quite a bit more work to track and file everything.
Especially as Berkeley is either a love it or hate it environment.
The issue is the burden of proof would be on those claiming NIL is earned only in the state the student athlete is attending school.I’m not sure how the IRS looks at NIL. I’m not a CPA and not a tax expert but it seems to me that the NIL revenue is earned in the same state as the school.
since they’re not paid to play football, but rather for endorsements, no.Do college athletes have to pay a percentage of their NIL for away games? Is it more beneficial for them to play away games in states such as Texas or Florida without state income taxes? Or is NIL not affected by where games are played?
Funny before I saw the LSU logo I thought this was gonna be Minnesota.
It’s 100% earned income for federal and state purposes. And it seems they have to pay by state. To me it would make more sense for players to pay in the state their team is based in, at least for pros since they are employees. Contractors can deduct expenses too which could include travel and vehicle costs. Write off that Bugatti and business suits for their appearances.If they don't now they will soon. I don't see any way NIL can be defended as not being earned as a participant in the games they play (even if they may miss some games). At some point every tax state will want their share.
I think they get 1099s rather than W2s until they become employees.I’m a tax cpa in California and my comments are general in nature. Athletes will need to consider their domicile and figure out how much revenue was earned in each state where they performed services. I would assume that UConns NIL would issue W-2s. Generally payroll providers would withhold in each state where money was earned. I’m not exactly certain who is handling payroll for UConn athletes. On the other hand, if the athletes were issued 1099s, then the athletes are responsible for remitting payments to each state. This could get hairy pretty fast.
I hope that the GM from each school are working closely with professionals so that they get appropriate guidance. Dealing with IRS audits on sch c is annoyingI think they get 1099s rather than W2s until they become employees.
I’d imagine there are some tax pros specializing in this field and consulting with the schools. Surely lots of Benjamin’s to be made.I hope that the GM from each school are working closely with professionals so that they get appropriate guidance. Dealing with IRS audits on sch c is annoying
The IRS will be the easy part. The concern will be if (or when) states begin looking into who they want to go after for taxes, which won't begin for a few years, but will be pursued retrospectively.I hope that the GM from each school are working closely with professionals so that they get appropriate guidance. Dealing with IRS audits on sch c is annoying
I'm not sure how many of the thousands at Bushnell Park are still in Connecticut. I said it would be terrible to a WTIC reporter.I wish we were no income tax like it used to be. Economy and industry was solid with lots of capital inflow and half the Fortune 500 headquartered here. We fumbled big time.