I'd like to avoid a team like Villanova that has 7 guys that will shoot from 3. We play great D but teams like that can kill you because you can't cover everyone all the time.
I think this is #1.
Would like to avoid a team that has 5 shooters, especially one that can defend and board the interior at the same time (Nova/Creighton/Maryland type).
In general, would love a team with a weak interior D so Sanogo can get back on track.
South Dakota St... I Think we could limit and outscore them, but that's an interesting matchup. They play 4 shooters, have an atrocious defense, but their one okay thing on D is defensive rebounding. Would be a contest of if they're okay defensive rebounding can hold up or are they just not able to defend any facet of our offense. 4 42%+ shooters on the court at the same time is terrifying though.
UAB shoots it accurately, but doesn't actually take many, only start 2 shooters. Their defense is pretty mediocre all around. This seems like a good matchup for us.
I think we'd eat Rutgers alive. We're a better vesion of them. They go for blocks instead of rebounds, but aren't even that effective.
Notre Dame is probably the landmine matchup. 5 shooters on offense, good defensive rebounding, no fouling. Maybe Sanogo can eat, but we'd have to outscore them while trading 2 for 3.
Wyoming has 2 3/4 shooters. They draw fouls, a little similar to Providence. We could probably grind them out.
Texas A&M has only 2 shooters. Also a litlte similar to Providence, with a bit of Marquette on defense. We'd kill them on the boards. Seems like an okay matchup, but they're hot lately.
Michigan/Indiana are clearly better teams than the others on this list, so it would suck if we got them. Indiana has a good interior D, so that would be a war down low. Michigan is surprisingly bad interior D despite Dickinson. Think it would be okay.