What Opposing Coaches Saw | The Boneyard

What Opposing Coaches Saw

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
902
Reaction Score
2,394
Many years ago I wrote occasional posts titled "The Other Side of the Hill" on the women's board. The purpose was to analyze what opposing teams might see relative to the strengths and weaknesses of UConn. This post will try to do something similar.

UConn wants/needs to play an uptempo game. Overall team quickness and speed is tough to match. They want to get the ball upcourt very quickly. They can create a number of steals which most often will lead to breaks finished with dunks. That isn't the biggest problem. When they get an easy defensive board; they push relentlessly. The guards will attempt to advance the ball with a quick long pass. This doesn't have to go for a quick dunk. The Huskies are adept at quick passes after the initial long pass. They move the ball to get a situation where a shooter gets the ball in the clear and can step into a three pointer. The problem for opposing teams trying to counter this strategy is that you can't tag one or two shooters in this situation. UConn will almost always have at least three and often four quality jumpshooters in the lineup at the same time.

The shooters will pull defenders away from the gut. If they aren't covered; they shoot dead open threes. If they are covered; the middle will be open and a delayed break can be lethal. Brimah is quicker than almost any big man he will play. He will beat the opposing bigs down the floor every time, and he can finish.

To stop the UConn uptempo offense; preventing the unhampered first pass is key. If a guard captures the board; you can't drop back. You must cover the guard. Since Boatright and Napier are small; most guards should be able to stop a free quick pass. If a big captures the board and the guard falls back; your big must cover the nearest guard. Most of the UConn bigs are not that experienced, and they will make a safe pass.
If your big is on the guard they pass to then his size will prevent the quick pass.

The guard will blow by your big, but by that time your defense will be more set. Typically once the UConn guards start dribbling if they don't see an immediate opening in the first say three dribbles; they will dribble the ball into the front court and set up a half court offense. Advantage defense.

Another thing you can try is trapping the ball handler, not necessarily trying for the steal, but to slow down the offense. Often times the nearest safe outlet will be a big. This will slow down things even more. If the guard tries for a long pass; it can often go awry.

Trap only on the sides. Don't trap the guard in the middle of the floor. The UConn guards are very quick, and with both sides open; they can set up an advantage situation quickly. Napier is extremely dangerous in the middle. He can drive and find an open shooter if the defense collapses. If the defense prevents quick penetration, his quickness will often set up a 15-17 footer in the key area which he drains regularly.

to be continued
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
902
Reaction Score
2,394
If you have a choice, take the ball out of Napier's hands in the half court. Don't worry about the bigs as scoring options in the half court.
If a big gets the ball down low, don't double. The bigs will only take open shots, and they will choose the most conservative pass. You may give up a few big baskets this way, but you will prevent open threes and openings for drives and one.

In the half court, only Boatright and Napier are real penetration threats. Kromah is more likely to drive than Giffey or Daniels. So play him a little more loosely. Daniels is a rhythm player; if he gets going, his confidence increases. He then can become a big scoring threat. Even his ability to drive increases. Samuels has a questionable shot, so keep him from driving. Keep the ball in his hands in the half court if you can.

Zone or man to man is an interesting question. If you can play tall players on the outside, it is an option to zone. However, UConn is experienced facing zones, so the passing can kill you. Mixing defenses is good if you can manage it. UConn tends to be impatient in the half court. Part of this is because UConn had the shot clock run down a lot last season; this forced difficult threes. So this memory may make the UConn players rush to take less than ideal shots. This is much to your advantage.

Finally when both Napier and Boatright are not on the floor together, trap more and try to force the ball into someone else's hands.

Offensively, resist the temptation to run with UConn. Take only opportunity breaks. Get the ball down low. UConn's bigs have trouble defending one on one with a widebody big. They may or may not trap, if they trap and your big is a good passer; UConn can really be hurt.
UConn players don't have a lot of girth; so if they are forced to chase, they lose blockout positions.

UConn has good depth across the board; however, they are vulnerable to foul trouble. Napier is the biggest loss, but both Brimah and Nolan are foul prone. Another note on fouling; talk to the refs early about hand checking on the outside even if it isn't occurring. You want the questionable calls to go your way later in the game. Drive if possible; UConn is basically a man to man team, and if the bigs have to help; good things will happen. Also UConn looked very shaky on the foul line, this may not be a year long problem, but for now don't allow uncontested interior shots.
 

caw

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,377
Reaction Score
13,979
I disagree with your analysis mainly because you have to include Daniels, and maybe even Giffey, with the bigs. Both are experienced and can score. If you want to amend to centers, then I think you would be accurate.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2011
Messages
2,420
Reaction Score
29,658
If I were an opposing coach I would force UConn to try and beat me in a halfcourt, possession by possession game. The problem for the opposing team is I think you have to make a decision about crashing the boards on the offensive end. If you send two or three guys to crash the board and UConn rebounds, they are going to push it and have numbers on the other end. What makes this interesting is one of UConns biggest strengths (running) might help negate their biggest weakness (rebounding).

That being said, playing UConn in a grind it out game in the 60s might fail as well. Napier, Boatright and Daniels (if he is in the right position on the floor) can all create their own shot in the halfcourt. This is why you saw so many guys open on the perimeter the other night (i.e. Calhoun and Giffey).
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 6 >>>1!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,271
Reaction Score
43,448
Interesting write up. The development of Nolan and Brimah will certainly change a lot of this write up. What are the defensive coaches options for OC?
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
902
Reaction Score
2,394
in re Calhoun, don't help off him. In re Daniels, neither he nor Giffey is a low post player. Daniels can make good passes into the low post.

In re making UConn play half court; if you can control turnovers; that is an optimal strategy. Work hard to get the ball down low, weakside help was slow or non existent against Maryland. The Huskies would prefer not to help big on big. If they help it is likely to be a guard. Bigs have to recognize and pass before the double. UConn depended on the guards ability to rebound defensively; that depends on good blockouts. If you can disrupt this with ball and player movement; the defense will suffer.
 

patrick

Hurley4#6
Joined
Feb 16, 2012
Messages
1,304
Reaction Score
1,673
Good write up but this is after just one game! It's gonna change drastically by the time we get to the Garden (in 2 week) if Brimah keeps improving and KO keeps making them work on the boards (btw we out rebounded the twerks!) and free throws (first game jitters imo)!
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,508
Reaction Score
4,973
Enjoyed the read. Great stuff Zy. Keep posting, u had been away awhile it seems. I don't post anymore much, but have enjoyed ur stuff for a long time!
 
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Messages
817
Reaction Score
1,144
Many years ago I wrote occasional posts titled "The Other Side of the Hill" on the women's board. The purpose was to analyze what opposing teams might see relative to the strengths and weaknesses of UConn. This post will try to do something similar.

UConn wants/needs to play an uptempo game. Overall team quickness and speed is tough to match. They want to get the ball upcourt very quickly. They can create a number of steals which most often will lead to breaks finished with dunks. That isn't the biggest problem. When they get an easy defensive board; they push relentlessly. The guards will attempt to advance the ball with a quick long pass. This doesn't have to go for a quick dunk. The Huskies are adept at quick passes after the initial long pass. They move the ball to get a situation where a shooter gets the ball in the clear and can step into a three pointer. The problem for opposing teams trying to counter this strategy is that you can't tag one or two shooters in this situation. UConn will almost always have at least three and often four quality jumpshooters in the lineup at the same time.

The shooters will pull defenders away from the gut. If they aren't covered; they shoot dead open threes. If they are covered; the middle will be open and a delayed break can be lethal. Brimah is quicker than almost any big man he will play. He will beat the opposing bigs down the floor every time, and he can finish.

To stop the UConn uptempo offense; preventing the unhampered first pass is key. If a guard captures the board; you can't drop back. You must cover the guard. Since Boatright and Napier are small; most guards should be able to stop a free quick pass. If a big captures the board and the guard falls back; your big must cover the nearest guard. Most of the UConn bigs are not that experienced, and they will make a safe pass.
If your big is on the guard they pass to then his size will prevent the quick pass.

The guard will blow by your big, but by that time your defense will be more set. Typically once the UConn guards start dribbling if they don't see an immediate opening in the first say three dribbles; they will dribble the ball into the front court and set up a half court offense. Advantage defense.

Another thing you can try is trapping the ball handler, not necessarily trying for the steal, but to slow down the offense. Often times the nearest safe outlet will be a big. This will slow down things even more. If the guard tries for a long pass; it can often go awry.

Trap only on the sides. Don't trap the guard in the middle of the floor. The UConn guards are very quick, and with both sides open; they can set up an advantage situation quickly. Napier is extremely dangerous in the middle. He can drive and find an open shooter if the defense collapses. If the defense prevents quick penetration, his quickness will often set up a 15-17 footer in the key area which he drains regularly.

to be continued


Only thing that fears me--teams with quality players who are 245 pds+. As well as Uconn played +17--I still don't think it was near the potential of this collective talent. We let down on defense several times as we forged out to double digit leads. There were at-least three times I thought we'd kick the doors in. Balancing Giffey and Boatright s minutes--so that we play big more-so than small--will alleviate some size issues but we are susceptible to big players giving us trouble.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
352
Guests online
2,513
Total visitors
2,865

Forum statistics

Threads
160,120
Messages
4,219,073
Members
10,083
Latest member
unlikejo


.
Top Bottom