CocoHusky
1,000,001 BY points
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
- Messages
- 17,203
- Reaction Score
- 73,827
Thanks for reading the article and believe it or not I somewhat agree with you. To be more specific your point about " bigs that are the exception not coming around that often" is IMO the heart of the problem. To the best of my knowledge when that type of player comes along UCONN has been in on all of them (Reimer- .... Boston).Agree on Dolson and I will admit 5 guards was not a correct analogy but my opinion somewhat stands; that is why would a traditional big (or post) want to play at UCONN when Geno doesn't normally play a traditional "post". He would rather out speed the other team with expectations that all players need to crash the boards. Where this sometimes fails is when you have an opponent with more then one big that can clog the lane from multiple sides and can shoot from the perimeter (reference Geno's post game on close games that had bigs clogging the lanes going back the past couple years) . There are bigs that are the exceptions but they don't come around very often, and I suspect other coaches entice bigs during the recruiting process based on utilization (e.g. high minutes played with an older version offence). though I stand corrected on the 1-4 vs my bad statement of 5 guards, the link confirms the use of faster players referencing guards and does not show a traditional post usage in the 1-4 approach to the game in the diagrams
Let's be cautious about a couple things 1) IMO those players are not coming to UCONN for a variety of reasons, not because of the offense UCONN is running. Geno is a smart and good enough coach to change that offensive to maximize any players skills. 2) Even with a traditional post on the roster UCONN still loses that game to Baylor mainly because UCONN shot 29%.
