EricLA
Cronus
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 15,247
- Reaction Score
- 84,546
I'm not talking about anyone being able to hang with UCONN, but rather a team who can hang with middle of the pack teams in the P5 conferences.
Temple, for example, lost to WVU in OT in the semifinals of the NIT. I would say they should be "competitive" next year. ECU made the NIT and won a few games, and while I think Tulsa only won one in the NIT (or lost in the first round), Tulane and USF both made the NCAA's. So including UCONN, those 6 teams should be at least solid.
Of the remaining teams, who pretty much sucked in the AAC (Memphis, UCF, Cinci, SMU and Houston), which, if any, will be decent? I know Cinci had a bunch of kids injured last year so I think it's safe to say they will be "better", but will they be able to beat a team like Virginia, Michigan, TCU, Washington State or Mississippi (those were all about the middle of the pack teams from each of the P5 conferences last year)...
It seems like Houston got some "help", but how much help will it really be? Any other teams poised to "move up" in the AAC? Thoughts?
Temple, for example, lost to WVU in OT in the semifinals of the NIT. I would say they should be "competitive" next year. ECU made the NIT and won a few games, and while I think Tulsa only won one in the NIT (or lost in the first round), Tulane and USF both made the NCAA's. So including UCONN, those 6 teams should be at least solid.
Of the remaining teams, who pretty much sucked in the AAC (Memphis, UCF, Cinci, SMU and Houston), which, if any, will be decent? I know Cinci had a bunch of kids injured last year so I think it's safe to say they will be "better", but will they be able to beat a team like Virginia, Michigan, TCU, Washington State or Mississippi (those were all about the middle of the pack teams from each of the P5 conferences last year)...
It seems like Houston got some "help", but how much help will it really be? Any other teams poised to "move up" in the AAC? Thoughts?