What’s ahead for UConn as it enters first ‘real offseason’ in portal, NIL era | Page 3 | The Boneyard

What’s ahead for UConn as it enters first ‘real offseason’ in portal, NIL era

“It’s not fun for most of the fans coaches ads etc and it does not seem sustainable “
I actually think that Nil/ transfer brings more interest to CBB( for the top schools anyway)
Fans don’t seem to be staying home and
Tv ratings the past weekend we’re up so I’m not sure of the level of unhappiness
As far as coaches ads etc not being happy
Don’t see why anyone would care about that
They are extraordinarily well compensated, and there’s no shortage of people looking to take their job
to be determined if NIL is sustainable at this level
The marketplace will determine that
On the other side I’m sure the players are very
Happy being able to earn lots of $
Let's see how long it lasts. As long as I can see the players as actual students attending a school I attended, I will gladly cheer for them. If they really just become a professional team that is sponsored by a university then I'm probably going to lose interest.

The massive flaw in all the court cases about paying these players is the belief that the players have some intrinsic market value. A handful do. They rest are only valuable because of the name on the jersey and the fans attached to that name. Here we are in portal season, ready to cheer on somebody we would have rooted against last year.

Almost all of the value of college football and basketball comes from the affinity fans have for their school. If these players, in any sport, were just in the minors, like we see in baseball, nobody would watch them on TV. OT Elite pretty much shows that.
 
We never really seem to have brought them into the fold for whatever reason and it shouldn't matter they didn't go here before people weigh in on that. It's a tiny state and they live here, we should be able reel in a few of these guys with all the winning the program does and how much it means to the state.
Shouldn't matter to us, but it very likely matters to them.
 
Cohen is CW Post undergrad...FWIW
And Wharton (UPenn) MBA.

The one non-ivy hedge fund billionaire I know of down here without an ivy league connection donated the (then) new basketball arena at UVA (his alma mater) and named it after his father.
 
Hurley and company know what they need/ want. They are more than capable of evaluating the talent in the portal.
From what Dan Hurley said himself the other day, he's more focused (too many first pitches, etc. last year, he said)
heading into this off-season.
We need him to find more Cam level players........and he's so driven he just might.
 
Let's see how long it lasts. As long as I can see the players as actual students attending a school I attended, I will gladly cheer for them. If they really just become a professional team that is sponsored by a university then I'm probably going to lose interest.

The massive flaw in all the court cases about paying these players is the belief that the players have some intrinsic market value. A handful do. They rest are only valuable because of the name on the jersey and the fans attached to that name. Here we are in portal season, ready to cheer on somebody we would have rooted against last year.

Almost all of the value of college football and basketball comes from the affinity fans have for their school. If these players, in any sport, were just in the minors, like we see in baseball, nobody would watch them on TV. OT Elite pretty much shows that.
Interesting take
Re interest level you may be correct
My interest in Cbb in limited to Uconn and I suspect the last 30 years excellent teams has a lot to do with ii
Re the court cases all the court said was that
The players could not be prevented from earning
Money off their name image and likeness
It it did not require the universities to pay the players justice Kavanaugh intimated that
Making the players employees might make sense

You say the players value comes from the affinity with the school
To me it comes from their talent
If UConn had no scholarships and the team
Was the “normal” college students would
The games be sell outs be on tv!?

Big time college fb and bb is in the situation there in because they were beyond greedy
The TV money, exorbitant ticket prices expanding schedules, put them awash in money
To hide the profits
They paid the coaches millions of dollars in salaries
Built more and more facilities
Paid assistant coaches, crazy money
Expanded the athletic departments to preposterous levels
Join conferences with doubles and triples the travel
Budget
They put all the non-revenue sports into the athletic budget, which was not supported by the school so that they could show the athletic department was really not making any money
Meanwhile, they were all getting fat and happy
And while the players were getting paid(athletic scholarship to me is payment) it was a small percentage of their value

Time will tell if the “pro model “ of college sports will work
My take is that it will and while older folks (I’m one of them) may lose interest The younger generation will know the system as it is and continue to support it.
Somehow, I find it impossible to think no matter what the model is, that Alabama football will not continue to be popular
 
Interesting take
Re interest level you may be correct
My interest in Cbb in limited to Uconn and I suspect the last 30 years excellent teams has a lot to do with ii
Re the court cases all the court said was that
The players could not be prevented from earning
Money off their name image and likeness
It it did not require the universities to pay the players justice Kavanaugh intimated that
Making the players employees might make sense

You say the players value comes from the affinity with the school
To me it comes from their talent
If UConn had no scholarships and the team
Was the “normal” college students would
The games be sell outs be on tv!?

Big time college fb and bb is in the situation there in because they were beyond greedy
The TV money, exorbitant ticket prices expanding schedules, put them awash in money
To hide the profits
They paid the coaches millions of dollars in salaries
Built more and more facilities
Paid assistant coaches, crazy money
Expanded the athletic departments to preposterous levels
Join conferences with doubles and triples the travel
Budget
They put all the non-revenue sports into the athletic budget, which was not supported by the school so that they could show the athletic department was really not making any money
Meanwhile, they were all getting fat and happy
And while the players were getting paid(athletic scholarship to me is payment) it was a small percentage of their value

Time will tell if the “pro model “ of college sports will work
My take is that it will and while older folks (I’m one of them) may lose interest The younger generation will know the system as it is and continue to support it.
Somehow, I find it impossible to think no matter what the model is, that Alabama football will not continue to be popular
You seem to be missing his point. There's a lot of talented players that's why OT Elite and Ignite were started but nobody cares about them. People root for the schools/laundry.
 
You seem to be missing his point. There's a lot of talented players that's why OT Elite and Ignite were started but nobody cares about them. People root for the schools/laundry.
We Will have to disagree
Intrinsically I feel the game is about the players and not the school
ignite didn’t work because of the change the landscape of college basketball
Mainly Nil That’s not my opinion that’s coming directly from Adam Silver
 
We Will have to disagree
Intrinsically I feel the game is about the players and not the school
ignite didn’t work because of the change the landscape of college basketball
Mainly Nil That’s not my opinion that’s coming directly from Adam Silver
Of course it's about talented players but it's also about the schools. Nobody gives a cr@p about minor leagues and they're all talented players.
 
Of course it's about talented players but it's also about the schools. Nobody gives a cr@p about minor leagues and they're all talented players.
Maybe we don’t really disagree
The college is the brand I get that the brand is evolving and don’t get why folks have a problem with that
don’t think it makes any difference whether the budget is 20 million like it is for Ohio State football or goes to 50 million and everybody’s a paid professional player
It seems we’re already there, and it doesn’t seem to affect interest or popularity
Perhaps it’s the cynicism in me about the system before NIL that influences my view lol
I just don’t see how much has changed with NIL other than the larger $ (players were getting paid 50+ years ago, and I saw the envelopes )and don’t understand the angst . No one complains about Hurleys salary of 4 million because that he said he earned it. And that’s probably true. The players start to get a taste in the world gonna end
thankfully we had a Supreme Court justice do the right thing(it does pain me to give props to justice
Kavanaugh)
As always value your point of view!!
 
Maybe we don’t really disagree
The college is the brand I get that the brand is evolving and don’t get why folks have a problem with that
don’t think it makes any difference whether the budget is 20 million like it is for Ohio State football or goes to 50 million and everybody’s a paid professional player
It seems we’re already there, and it doesn’t seem to affect interest or popularity
Perhaps it’s the cynicism in me about the system before NIL that influences my view lol
I just don’t see how much has changed with NIL other than the larger $ (players were getting paid 50+ years ago, and I saw the envelopes )and don’t understand the angst . No one complains about Hurleys salary of 4 million because that he said he earned it. And that’s probably true. The players start to get a taste in the world gonna end
thankfully we had a Supreme Court justice do the right thing(it does pain me to give props to justice
Kavanaugh)
As always value your point of view!!
I think it's worse because it dramatically shrinks the field of schools who can compete. I'm a fan of what NIL is supposed to be, I'm not a fan of the pay to play that it is. It's nice kids who are good enough can jump to a higher level but I don't think kids should be transferring 4 times in 4 years and I don't think how good a school is should be based on who has the most billionaires who want to have a good basketball/football team. I would've preferred watching all these kids for Belmont in the sweet 16 instead of them playing for SEC and Big 10 teams.

Hurley makes a lot more than 4 million per year.
 

Online statistics

Members online
225
Guests online
3,130
Total visitors
3,355

Forum statistics

Threads
163,953
Messages
4,376,561
Members
10,168
Latest member
CTFan142


.
..
Top Bottom