Why does the NET love WV so much?
This isn't a shot at WV, I don't have a strong opinion of them, and will openly admit to not having watched them play. I'm just trying to have a better understanding of how these rankings work.
When I look at their team sheet I see:
Quad 1 0-3
Quad 2 2-2
Quad 3 7-0
Quad 4 10-0
So they have 17 wins against essentially non-tournament type teams. They have quality wins over OK State and Iowa State...but that's kinda it. And while those are quality wins, they aren't exactly signature, elite level wins.
The 10 toughest games according to NET rankings :
#3 Texas (Neutral Court) L 78-73
#21 @Baylor L 75-65
#28 @ok State L 64-57
#28 OK State W 54-37
#38 Iowa State W 82-68
#59 @Arizona L 77-62
#62 @Coloardo L 65-60
#62 Colorado W 73-46
#76 Kansas W 76-43
#79 BYU W 66-53
I just don't see it. It DOES look like Morgantown is a very tough place to play, they blow teams out at home. SOS is 74th, non conference SOS is 189. What am I missing? Is it because they played a close game with Texas? The fact they have some lopsided home wins against Quad 3s and a couple of 2s?
To me that resume looks like a fringe top 25 team yet they are 11th in the NET? (Maybe the NET hasn't been updated to reflect last night's game, but still seems wild). Pretty much every listed behind them all the way down to Richmond at 30th has a better resume when you just look at wins and losses by quads. And I get that simply looking at quads isn't the end all be all - but can someone explain why the computers seem to like WV so much?