Yeah, I'm replying again. I'm not angry and only mildly annoyed by being called "fodder." I've had my say regarding that subject. Let's assume we (and Ole Miss)
ARE fodder in football. So, I declare peace.
And yet. Here's an Idea of what football "fodder" schools get to spend on sports infrastucture and non football sports without the students and taxpayers footing the bill:
The Top 25 Most Valuable College Football Programs, courtesy of GoBankingRates:
1. Texas (Tie) – $147
1. Texas A&M (Tie) – $147M
3. Michigan – $139M
4. Alabama – $134M
5. Ohio State – $132M
6. Oklahoma – $129M
7. Georgia – $125M
8. Notre Dame $120M
9. Florida (Tie) – $117M
9. Auburn (Tie) – $117M
11. LSU – $114M
12. Tennessee – $113M
13. Penn State – $104M
14. Oregon (Tie) – $96M
14. Florida State (Tie) – $96M
16. South Carolina (Tie) – $95M
16. Arkansas (Tie) – $95M
18. USC – $93M
19. Washington – $92M
20. Nebraska – $91M
21. Iowa – $89M
22. Michigan State – $87M
23. Wisconsin – $86M
24. Ole Miss – $84M
25. Clemson – $77M
ALSO - and you can see why Clempson about ACC profit sharing.