Approximately 127 of 130 defensive staffs are teaching better fundamentals. Or, somehow we managed to find the very worst players in FCS? The ones that can't tackle, can't shed blocks, etc... come on. Do really come to that conclusion?
Its a number of things.....but I think it comes down to the overall baseline talent of the players.
As someone provided in an analogy of the team not too long ago, the vast majority of the players are from the FCS ranks.
A number of players did not have any offers at all...BCS, FCS or whatever.
Of those who had FCS offers, none were from the "power houses of FCS schools" ....... I can't recall any that had offers from Villanova, Delaware, James Madison, New Hampshire, Richmond, William and Mary, etc. Most of those FCS schools are frequent participants in FCS playoffs, and more than a few have won National Championships at the FCS level. And that is just mentioning the East coast FCS schools. Heck, before UMass went to BCS/FBS status, they won two national championships at the FCS level.
Beyond that, I'm not sure if many of our recruits also had offers from USF, UCF, Houston, SMU, Memphis, Cincinnatti in the AAC.
Our recruiting battles against FCS schools sometimes list Fairfield, Sacred Heart, Albany, etc.
Sometimes our recruit backgrounds suggest some have never played football before high school. Missed out learning fundamentals at the midget FB league level and improving on those skills through high school. Of those we get from high schools, do they come from S, M, L, LL category schools and have any of those high schools won state championships.
So yes, I think the players in a good portion of the other AAC schools are "coached up" from a higher base line talent out of high school.
I like Randy, and wish him the best. But he is behind a BIG 8 ball.