No, because she won, on the road, in OT.So Brondello outcoached the million dollar coach because AT missed a pair of FTs and a bunny? Just clarifying.
To clarify could one argue the million dollar coach outcoached Sandy because he lost?
No, because she won, on the road, in OT.So Brondello outcoached the million dollar coach because AT missed a pair of FTs and a bunny? Just clarifying.
Another question perhaps minor would be the ability of the Merc to hit the three. They were absolutely abysmal in that regard yesterday, while the Liberty defense was on point a number of those missed threes were real clean looks.Lot
To me the major question for game 2 is Meeseman - does the former finals MVP show up, or the sloppy, step slow player we saw yesterday? (I'm assuming no matter what we won't see Stewie on the court, so Meeseman suddenly becomes critical for the Lib.)
If AT doesn't miss a pair of FTs and a bunny in the final 2 minutes, doesn't Phoenix win in regulation? I don't think this is about either coach.No, because she won, on the road, in OT.
To clarify could one argue the million dollar coach outcoached Sandy because he lost?
Malonga really impressed me with her composure in this game. Her lay up for the and-one was a beautiful example of why you run the floor as a big. And she's only going to get better. Oh man that's gonna be something!Seattle - wow, what a 4th quarter! Loads of kudos to go around, but a special brava to Malonga: no one can actually stop Aja, but she really made it difficult for her towards the end (at 19 years old).
This is just the beginning. Time will increase the perspective that the Ace's screwed up turning the Plum trade into a three team one to get Loyd instead. The stupidity of people who should know better is unbelievable. Malonga is going to be a superstar as loyd value decreases. I stated that taking loyd instead of Malonga was mistake right from the beginning. With Malonga playing next to Wilson the Aces would have been set for years in the one area they are weak. The two together would dominate the post against every team. The killer is that Malonga is on a rookie salary while Loyd comes at a high cap price.Malonga really impressed me with her composure in this game. Her lay up for the and-one was a beautiful example of why you run the floor as a big. And she's only going to get better. Oh man that's gonna be something!
Even LaChina Robinson was struggling with explaining that call last night. Honestly don't know how the referees thought Hillmon caused it. Wasn't able to see where they were positioned during the replays.Not for nothing, we saw one of the most egregious "leaning" screens in by ATL's Turner, and when we saw the foul go against ATL, decided to watch something else. No skin in this game, however the officials seemed to be letting a lot of crud go in the lane. IMO.
Coming back from that kind of deficit required them to be on all cylinders. Bingo. Interesting from a scoring perspective: as you note, Nneka and Sky were on their games, but were the only starters in double figures. However, Malonga and Wheeler both scored 11 points.Seattle executed down the stretch. Nneka and Skylar were particularly good. The Vegas streak is over.
If AT doesn't miss a pair of FTs and a bunny in the final 2 minutes, doesn't Phoenix win in regulation? I don't think this is about either coach.
The question is whether the trade would have happened in the first place. Not sure if LA would have been willing to make the same pick exchange had it been a two team deal.This is just the beginning. Time will increase the perspective that the Ace's screwed up turning the Plum trade into a three team one to get Loyd instead. The stupidity of people who should know better is unbelievable. Malonga is going to be a superstar as loyd value decreases. I stated that taking loyd instead of Malonga was mistake right from the beginning. With Malonga playing next to Wilson the Aces would have been set for years in the one area they are weak. The two together would dominate the post against every team. The killer is that Malonga is on a rookie salary while Loyd comes at a high cap price.
Don't even use the excuse that no one knew what the second draft pick could have gotten. It was either Malonga or Paige B. It became obvious sooner than expected that loyd did not fit into the Aces starting lineup. Every spot has some teams run by incompetents, but the WNBA have taken it to a new level. This was a major reason they would have failed if not supported by the NBA.
The question is whether the trade would have happened in the first place. Not sure if LA would have been willing to make the same pick exchange had it been a two team deal.
Why? It envolved no change for LA. They wanted Plum and they got her. It was LV and Seattle that made it a three team deal. LV wanted to replace Plum thinking they could repeat their last championship run. Seattle wanted to be rid of loyd and the Ace's were the perfect suckers. Loyd was no longer worth a high first round pick. It was Seattle that came away the big winner. They got a future superstar for an over the hill malcontent they were eager to part ways with. The Aces lost big time. Loyd could have been replaced for the salary she pulls down. It is not so easy to get a good,let alone a post player of Molanga's capabilities.The question is whether the trade would have happened in the first place. Not sure if LA would have been willing to make the same pick exchange had it been a two team deal.
LolIf AT doesn't miss a pair of FTs and a bunny in the final 2 minutes, doesn't Phoenix win in regulation? I don't think this is about either coach. To
NO other WNBA players routinely get double digit FT's nearly every game, nor do the moving screens get ignored like Wilson. I don't know how many more in that game last night. Quite a few by my eye. She leans her hip out and keeps moving in nearly every screen she sets. She also routinely gets called for only 1-2 fouls per game playing major minutes.As so do Napheesa, Stewie and maybe especially AT... it's the way it's played in all the major leagues.
I fully understand that Malonga's value.Why? It envolved no change for LA. They wanted Plum and they got her. It was LV and Seattle that made it a three team deal. LV wanted to replace Plum thinking they could repeat their last championship run. Seattle wanted to be rid of loyd and the Ace's were the perfect suckers. Loyd was no longer worth a high first round pick. It was Seattle that came away the big winner. They got a future superstar for an over the hill malcontent they were eager to part ways with. The Aces lost big time. Loyd could have been replaced for the salary she pulls down. It is not so easy to get a good,let alone a post player of Molanga's capabilities.
What makes Malonga so valuable is that she excells in all aspects of the game. She is a really good defender and rebounder. She also is a good offensive threat and will get better with time. The Aces do not have anyone who is as good as her ( exempting Wilson) in any of those areas. The post positon defensively is their weak point. They usually need to play Chelsea against a post player which she does well. However, a player with Molanga's length and athleticism is not guardable by her.
I had that thing all messed up in my mindI fully understand that Malonga's value.
Plum requested a trade and had to sign off on any trade, which gave me the impression that teams involved would have an advantage in negotiations. Sometimes I wonder as to whether LA would have made the same deal straight up without Seattle's involvement.
I could have done a better job explaining my reasoning in my original post. Glad my follow up helped to clarify where I was coming from.I had that thing all messed up in my mind
LA Gave up: 2025 #2 and #13, Li
LA Received: Plum, 2025 #9 (from Seattle), 2026 Seattle 2nd
One to One:
LA gives up: 2025 #2
LA Receives: Plum, and ??? 2026 LV 1st (to Seattle in RL)? Assortment of 2nd and 3rds? Nothing?
Had to be a way to ship Plum to LA without giving up a top 3 pick, one of the most valuable trade chips in any sport. Feel like there is much greater variability in quality among WNBA front offices than in more established leagues.