Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Way too early bracketology
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="oldhusky, post: 3537018, member: 9844"] From what I can tell Charlie is not a Uconn friend and ESPN's recruiting class rankings are pretty much worthless if your school has a significant foreign recruit. So maybe not mentioning Anna just fits in, she wasn't very relevant as a recruit because ESPN can't or won't even try to make a accurate assessment of foreign players. It bothers me that a source so often referenced as one of the major ones for recruiting information doesn't even try to get this right. It is not a minor oversight but rather a major flaw in their product. My feelings about Charlie are mostly related to how he had us seeded for this year. It turns out it didn't matter, but this year there was potentially a big difference in being ranked 5th overall and the highest 2 seed, and everything lower than that. There were three teams this year that were clearly a notch above the next tier, and we lost to all three. Frankly the odds of getting to the final four by beating one of those three teams was not good. Our best or most probable path involved either getting the 4th number one seed, or playing and beating that seed if we were ranked as the 5th best overall, and the highest second seed. Normally the highest ranked 1 seed winds up in the same bracket as the lowest ranked 2 seed, and the lowest ranked 1 seed would be in the the same bracket as the highest ranked 2 seed. So if we could achieve an overall rank of 4th ( last 1 seed) or 5th ( highest 2 seed) we could probably avoid having to beat South Carolina, Oregon, or Baylor to get into the final four for the 13th consecutive season. Most years the differences would be small, but given this amazing final four streak, and the dominance of the top three teams, I'm upset he would abandon that concept for geographic reasons (too many Pac 12 teams in the west) and pretty much say it doesn't matter if you are the 5th best team, you don't get to be in the same bracket as the 4th ranked team, you have to go thru one of the top 3. If we were 6th or lower we don't deserve the easier path, but I believe you could have made a case for us as the 4th number 1 seed, and if we were not the 5th overall and highest second seed I think that would be robbing us of our deserved place, something Charlie would happily do. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,463
Messages
4,397,208
Members
10,209
Latest member
noelle
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Way too early bracketology
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom