- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 246
- Reaction Score
- 2,026
For me it was 2013 because we were still used to winning at that point, so the losses hurt more. I'm not sure if I've been more angry at a game than I was during that night at Buffalo.
Getting trounced by Buffalo after nearly beating Michigan. How!For me it was 2013 because we were still used to winning at that point, so the losses hurt more. I'm not sure if I've been more angry at a game than I was during that night at Buffalo.
I expected it to be bad. I did not expect it to be all time worst defense bad.This year was pretty much expected by most to be bad... 2016 sucked.
I can't answer. This is like asking which hurts more: sticking a needle in your eye or pulling out a toenail. They all sucked bad. This season is painful because I really expected us to compete with Cincy and Memphis. If we don't compete down the stretch, this will be soul stomping.
I disagree. Football with no defense sucks in my opinion. College football is one of my favorite sports, but it’s way too easy to score and making it too arena-like.
Randy’s done a great job lowering expectations. In contrast, Danny Hurley wants to have the unrealistically high expectations of the casual fans. I like Danny’s approach better.
Building a football program is a night and day difference from building a hoops program though. In football, you need several recruiting classes to come in and turn things around. In hoops, you can win with 1 or 2 good players almost right away.
I do get your point: casual fans want to hear/read about the program improving and how many games we can win. They don't want to hear (or don't understand) that building a football programs takes YEARS. Lots and lots and lots of years. It stinks - we've been seemingly rebuilding forever and we will need to be patient during yet another rebuild.
This is such a tired cliche. Yes, building a "Program", meaning a sustainable group of guys with enough experienced depth to replace losses and still win 7-8 games a year, every year, takes a few years. No question.
But there is no excuse for year two of your rebuild being dramatically worse than year 1. There is no excuse for the kind of regression we've seen from this team. There are absolutely things you can do to win right now. K-State was once where we are, and they turned it around quickly by embracing JUCOs among other things. Randy made a mistake in my opinion, in deciding to play "his" freshmen. Anybody on the roster is his guy now and deserves to be treated as such. I think he even partially acknowledged it after the last game, saying he'd give more time to more experienced guys.
I'll put it more simply, Diaco, ever incompetent, used to win 2-3 games with his players. Certainly Randy could have and should have tried to merely bring competence to that situation, win 4-5 games, and work in his new recruits over time. He didn't need to set the place on fire.
I was catatonic for weeks after "the Navy game".I went to the Navy game...I am still speechless.
I can only type.
It's tired yes but that doesn't make it any less true. We don't have experienced depth. I guess the only knock on Edsall is that he should have taken the FR approach last year so we'd be in Year 2 with those guys who got significant time last year. People forget that Diaco didn't get fired until after Christmas so there just wasn't ample time to build a bigger class with his guys. Our inability to can coaches at the right time has cost us dearly. Not trying to make excuses for the guy. Reality is what it is. Diaco under-recruited during his time here and didn't coach/develop his guys to anywhere near FBS level. Not sure how Edsall can be blamed for that.
Oddly, you basically just made a case for keeping Diaco another year. They were paying him anyway and its not like Randy wasn't gonna be available.