Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="kcc1442, post: 2801504, member: 2577"] We see differently clearly. I see the factors that resulted in him being the all-time leading scorer in NCAA. The fact he played on terrible teams and was given the right to shoot 38 (!) shots per game despite only shooting 43% from the field. Those numbers make a highly criticized freshman Trae Young blush. So good for him. He compiled a lot of points but shot an average to below average FG% on crappy teams against sub par (for todays standards) defense. His teams NEVER won anything of significance whatsoever. Meaning he never was good enough to elevate the other players on his team as Kemba clearly did winning a national championship. The fact that you don't see how Kemba could be considered just as legendary especially given that he still has probably another 7 years left in his career is baffling to the say the least. The idea that your pretentiousness can't allow them to even be compared is frankly just idiotic. I'm not saying Pistol wasn't a great player. He was. Revolutionary too. He changed the game in many ways. But Kemba plays against dozens of guys that are quicker, faster, and more explosive than Pistol or any of the guys defending him were. [/QUOTE]