Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="caw, post: 3432782, member: 563"]
Career wise both had the three point line change.

I never mentioned 2point fg% or FT% or true shooting % (which is really just an amalgamation of those three numbers and thus just a restatement on your part).

When I say significant and not significant when talking about statistics I mean statistically significant.  Feelings have no bearing here.

If you want to know how I feel, I feel it would be a toss up between the two.  CV is not significantly better than Dyson.  He brings some different things that could have won him a spot in 09.  It would have been interesting to see if the much tougher competition (and perhaps significantly so as per SOS) would have negated his apparent statistical advantages, or if the added talent around him would have allowed him more open looks and freedom.   I do not think (eye test) he is near the athlete Dyson was.

Either way I do not think CV would have been a focal point of the offense in those years and would have probably best been played off the bench or as a starter similar to how Rash and Denham went back and forth.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach