Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="DaveHuskiesFan, post: 3432681, member: 935"] Dyson was a career 31.8% 3PT shooter form a much closer line. Vital is 35.2%. I'd consider that significant. Dyson was 42.3% from 2 point shots. Vital is 46.2%. I'd consider that significant as well. FT% dyson was 73.5%, Vital is 82.9%. i'd consider that significant. True shooting % Dyson was 50.55% and Vital is 56.6%. I'd consider that significant. Dyson had higher assist rates, but also a higher turnover rate. I do think Vital overall, is a significantly better player. And this is the worst shooting year of his career so it's similar in that regard (Dyson's senior year was also his worst shooting year interestingly enough). [/QUOTE]