- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 10,455
- Reaction Score
- 41,535
Losing VT will not help the ACC. They have a very strong hold on Virginia and NC, which are the Mid-Atlantic's Crown Jewels. Trading half of the Virginia viewership for Cincinnati isn't even close to helpful. Cincy recruits well right now and that would get better being in a P5 conference. Adding Cincy doesn't do squat in terms of other ACC schools recruiting in Ohio. Most top players in Ohio don't care what Cincy is doing. They always look to play in the B1G or SEC first. Cincy is a great town and a great sports school but it is a blip on the radar in the big picture with Ohio State lurking.
The ACC needs strength in the megalopolis of the northeast, particularly New York, and they need lots of valuable content. They also need to get some state flagships when they can instead of adding one fading private school or second fiddle state school after another. UConn fits that bill. The loss of VT would sting. The ACC is a weak football conference and trading VT for anyone else available is a net loss on that front. Reality is that the ACC is financially weakened and needs to prepare for some losses.
My belief is that ACC should add Cincy and UConn because change is inevitable. The ACC will lose a few schools and by having enough quality programs already in the fold, they could possibly get a network and survive some pillaging. They can also protect themselves against the B12 and B1G taking UConn/Cincy off the table, which would leave them with nowhere to turn. I'll believe the ACC is safe when they have a lucrative deal that is competitive with the other power conferences. Until then, talk that the ACC is strong rings hollow. The ACC and B12 would be wise to prepare for a dual to the death and I believe the conference with the most quality schools locked into a GOR will win that battle. The conferences could probably work out trades if it came down to it and the result benefitted all involved. However, if that were to happen, I'd want to have the most schools to work with.
The ACC needs strength in the megalopolis of the northeast, particularly New York, and they need lots of valuable content. They also need to get some state flagships when they can instead of adding one fading private school or second fiddle state school after another. UConn fits that bill. The loss of VT would sting. The ACC is a weak football conference and trading VT for anyone else available is a net loss on that front. Reality is that the ACC is financially weakened and needs to prepare for some losses.
My belief is that ACC should add Cincy and UConn because change is inevitable. The ACC will lose a few schools and by having enough quality programs already in the fold, they could possibly get a network and survive some pillaging. They can also protect themselves against the B12 and B1G taking UConn/Cincy off the table, which would leave them with nowhere to turn. I'll believe the ACC is safe when they have a lucrative deal that is competitive with the other power conferences. Until then, talk that the ACC is strong rings hollow. The ACC and B12 would be wise to prepare for a dual to the death and I believe the conference with the most quality schools locked into a GOR will win that battle. The conferences could probably work out trades if it came down to it and the result benefitted all involved. However, if that were to happen, I'd want to have the most schools to work with.
