One thing that I need clarification on (as it appears most are glossing over it) is how the proposed $20.5 million revenue sharing related to NIL.
it appears that every mention on how this favors the BE (as the non-football schools won't have to pay football players) assumes that the revenue sharing includes NIL. Personally I don't believe that this is the case as a) it has never been explicitly stated that it is and b) there is no way an overall cap can be placed on NIL beyond the amount of available funds any individual school has to allocate to NIL. The NCAA placing an NIL cap will never survive a lawsuit.