Step 1: Being Competitive!The energy that is pouring into this program right now is almost unbelievable. We aren't even truly "back" yet, but the fan base can sense that the corner has been turned. When was the last time a basically .500 team started selling out games towards the end of the season? I don't care what the ticket prices are. This is usually when fans start tuning out if the team isn't winning. There's just something about this group of kids and all that they have been through that this fan base loves. And it doesn't hurt that we have Danny Hurley, aka The Carpenter, in charge of the rebuild. Also doesn't hurt that we have the BE on the horizon. I'm just so happy for everyone involved! I can't make Sunday, but I surely took advantage of those prices to buy my ticket for the Houston game - we need to send CV off properly.
The heartbreakers to Xavier Houston and nova wudda had us in the top 25-30 if we won prolly top 25I want a huge win. The loss to USF earlier this year is the only reason this team isn’t top 50 right now. Payback time
I want a huge win. The loss to USF earlier this year is the only reason this team isn’t top 50 right now. Payback time
Yeah maybe in the AP, but I meant the algorithmic rankings like Kenpom, which to roughly summarize are based on point differential relative to the expected result. That big USF knocked us down ~15 spots.The heartbreakers to Xavier Houston and nova wudda had us in the top 25-30 if we won prolly top 25
Yeah maybe in the AP, but I meant the algorithmic rankings like Kenpom, which to roughly summarize are based on point differential relative to the expected result. That big USF knocked us down ~15 spots.
it's beyond dumb that preseason poll rankings matter to the selection committee. do algorithmic ranks like kenpom matter or just NET?
if NET is all that matters it should replace the AP and coaches polls, like how the CFP ranking ultimately replaces them during football season. why do we care what these subjective polls say anyways?
is it still the same other than NET replacing RPI?Here's an example of a team sheet the committee might have. All members value different metrics and eye test differently.
is it still the same other than NET replacing RPI?
Yeah maybe in the AP, but I meant the algorithmic rankings like Kenpom, which to roughly summarize are based on point differential relative to the expected result. That big USF knocked us down ~15 spots.
I was at that game too. Let’s smack them at home.Bounce back & “pride” is what I’m looking for in this game. Was at the USF game and they thoroughly embarrassed us. Let’s return the favor
I never said that, and we fell 14 spots in Kenpom ranking both times if that helps.So a 15 point road loss to USF hurts more than a 9 point home loss to an atrocious St Joe's team? It seems like the St Joe loss should be a worse outcome statistically.
I never said that, and we fell 14 spots in Kenpom ranking both times if that helps.
Well something to keep in mind is that rankings are just based on your offense and defensive efficiencies. So while we probably fell further in those metrics after the St. Joe’s loss, it just happened that we fell below 14 other teams then. The distance between each team isn’t equal.just trying to understand how the algorithm works. It seemed you were implying that the USF loss had a bigger negative effect than the St Joe loss which seemed counter-intuitive. No biggie.