Oh for god's sake none of this high school kids know how to play defense. KLS will learn just like every other player. And no, she won't be defending guards in college.
Could her defense , or lack thereof , be the reason she is not getting as much playing time as the other three girls???
The kind of question that makes you go ....Hmmmm
Not exactly none. Kelly jumped out at us because even as a frosh she understood and used proper defensive mechanics.
Young players are taught how to shoot and score. That's what they spend their time doing. There's no defense played in AAU tournaments and little played at the HS level. Players are taught how to play defense in college and some actually learn how to play it. Plus, 3x3 is like streetball with no team or help defense. Posters are certainly allowed to criticize the lack of defense played by high school players but I don't think it has much meaning.
Agree and disagree. I have watched all of the games and she is definitely suffering from the injury but my question is whats the other 3 players problem. They have all lost their man, been beat backdoor, given up 3s, They are hesitant on screen switches and often out of position. By that I mean when their player is on the weak side they guard and let them go baseline and wing toward the basket when their teammates are middle.
If this was pointed at me, I probably need to clarify or apologize. I actually thought that saying someone had a bad game or rough shooting night was the perfect way to state facts without implying doubt about the person's ability. That is probably how the ladies would characterize the day.This is why I find this board so fascinating. In another thread I gave an opinion that there may be a challenger to KML's 3 point crown coming to UConn in the near future. Only to be met with a chorus of how silly it is to speculate that a player that hasn't even stepped on campus should even be mentioned in the group of great 3 pt. UConn shooters. The praise was not yet warranted. Now, in this thread, an admonishment for even the mildest of criticisms. (I.E. rough game, lost her man).
Must I find the "Goldilocks" of repartee ? Not to hot, not to cold. And no speculating ! I could follow Doggy's lead but I think I will do what any sensible
poster (Not that doggy isn't sensible) in my position would do, as should KLS if she ever hears about this. It starts with an I and ends with an E
I think you might be underestimating the ability of UConn recruits to withstand and even thrive in the environment they have signed up for. It's not that long ago in this country that teens were facing significantly more stress than they face today. Yesterday's young kids were working in factories and farms, and were often responsible for their younger siblings. They even toted guns in wars.I'm just going to throw this out there. I know this board has fun stirring the pot a bit, but I think this criticism is out of line for young people in their position. They haven't even made it to college yet; they are not getting paid; and they have been through a grueling international competition. We are very fortunate for them to have selected UCONN to be THE place they want to spend their college years and us to be their fan/support group.
I think you might be underestimating the ability of UConn recruits to withstand and even thrive in the environment they have signed up for. It's not that long ago in this country that teens were facing significantly more stress than they face today. Yesterday's young kids were working in factories and farms, and were often responsible for their younger siblings. They even toted guns in wars.
I think it's a mistake to mollycoddle todays teens and to give each of them a trophy merely for existing. They can handle it. Particularly the kids who choose to be UConn athletes. They are tough. No criticism from the Boneyard is going to deter them from reaching their goals. They are here because they know they are strong and are winners!