Wbbfan1
And That’s The Way It Is
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,173
- Reaction Score
- 17,480
Dunbar jumped to 43.Eckmark dropped from 16 to 26. No Kia Nurse in the top 150???
Eckmark dropped from 16 to 26. No Kia Nurse in the top 150???
Eckmark dropped from 16 to 26. No Kia Nurse in the top 150???
Agree. Would they even travel to Canada to watch prospects play?Because of the Canadian thing, she's probably off many people's radars.
There are other Canadian girls listed.Keep in mind, it's "Prospects Nation"
Agree. Would they even travel to Canada to watch prospects play?
What have you done for me lately? She didn't play summer AAU ball. Look at the leaps by Paris Kea, Dekeiya Cohen and Kortney Dunbar. Brianna Turner also dropped.Eckmark dropped from 16 to 26.
These US reviewers usually don't even try to rate the women north of the border. Achonwa was never rated by Hoopgurlz (when the guys that run Prospects Nation used to run Hoopgurlz), although they stated that if she were rated, she would have been top 25. (Of course they said that AFTER she blossomed last season.)No Kia Nurse in the top 150???
There are other Canadian girls listed.
Those other women attended high school in Florida.There are other Canadian girls listed.
Ahh, well there you go. They just had them listed as "Canada".Those other women attended high school in Florida.
Both Full Court and Blue Star have Brianna Turner ranked first, but she dropped in Prospects Nation to 5th. This consistent with the fact that Brianna played for USA Basketball last summer but not AAU, and as others have pointed out, surging players excelled in AAU ball last summer.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.......
Both Full Court and Blue Star have Brianna Turner ranked first, but she dropped in Prospects Nation to 5th. This consistent with the fact that Brianna played for USA Basketball last summer but not AAU, and as others have pointed out, surging players excelled in AAU ball last summer.
You have to take into account which players are clients of that group and their services. Some of them pay money to them for events, training, videos, etc. That clearly factors in to what they do.
That's a better ranking.







It's all relative really. If they kids don't play AAU ball, or aren't seen, their rating can still stay high (it seems) if their "reputation" warrants it. But it also seems that the ranking services totally favor kids who play in their AAU events, or play for teams "sponsored" by them. To me it warps the truth and objectivity of the rankings.Doesnt Ekmark sitting out senior season and Gabby's injury affect their ranking? Look what happened when Morgan tore her ACL. Just saying...
Geno can do more with a 26 than most coaches can do with a 16 or even a 6.Eckmark dropped from 16 to 26. No Kia Nurse in the top 150???
Since no one responded to you yet, I'll answer. There are basically 4 services that provide rankings for free:.
I guess I'll have to ask - how many active Girls High School Basketball ranking services are there these days?