- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,550
- Reaction Score
- 1,044
WHY is the a Twitter?
My appology to you Meyer. My bad. It was WALLY EAST that mentioned dating.Because you mentioned dating !
Me too. I'm beginning to worry about this age thing.Cheez! I must be getting old (older). Watched the entire game and didn't notice anything special about the UT cheerleaders except the "hookem horns" bit with their hands. Maybe I have a finger fetish.
To be entirely fair we'll need a video.I think I'm going to have to see more pictures before I can make any further comments.....
Did you see his tweets?"....tweet about getting turned on." What??? Don't see that at all. I'm a 67 year old male who is quite happy that I'll be leaving this orb shortly, before the 'crime' of offending someone becomes punishable by death in this country. For the record I am not a fan of cheerleaders at all, whether dressed as matrons or pole dancers.
Ok, you had me going there for awhile. Thought I was forgetting stuff.....again.My appology to you Meyer. My bad. It was WALLY EAST that mentioned dating.
Listen, I thought the cheerleader schitck was a hoot, I was just trying to point out how ridiculous it can get at times in embracing political correctness- that's all.No, rooting for the team as one of the symbols of the spirit of the school. That was the point.
Honesty is so refreshing. If there is a justice in the universe, you will be condemned to watching cheerleaders throughout eternity.Please clear something up for me. I'm pushing 80, so what women am I allowed to date age-wise? (With my wife's permission and subject to my cardiologist's blessing of course). Also, I admit looking at pictures of the cheerleaders. Will I be condemned to eternal damnation?
Meanwhile, lets forget the whole thing and move on. It's over.
Please clear something up for me. I'm pushing 80, so what women am I allowed to date age-wise? (With my wife's permission and subject to my cardiologist's blessing of course).
The rule is actually divide by 2 and add 10 (not 7)
Well it must be true if Wikipedia says so.No, it's 7. Even Wikipedia has it as +7, which points out that it dates back more than 100 years.
18/2 + 7= 16 but 18/2 + 10 = 19, which makes no sense.
But, yes, obviously just a rule of thumb.
Well it must be true if Wikipedia says so.
I think the 18 year old example you site is silly, since the premise is what actually constitutes age appropriate dating of mature adults, not teenagers. Try 50/2 + 10 = 35 and the formula makes a bit more sense.
Either way, JA is a dumba$$ and needs to keep his inner voice in check. I think his embarrassment over the public flogging he has received is punishment enough and folks should move on.
They're actually chaps, so the view from behind is anything but baggy pants.Is wearing underwear over baggy pants sexy? It's so tough to keep up with the trends.
Ahhh, got it.They're actually chaps, so the view from behind is anything but baggy pants.
Those young ladies happened to be representative s of the UT Dance Team. They also had a larger group of cheerleaders.Danny's got some on his Facebook page ...
https://scontent-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/h...=3c4be17a7dab08d74299ef4030a0504d&oe=55BD3207
Personally I think the whole thing is the Texas team's fault. If the game had been more of a contest, no one would've cared what the cheerleaders were doing ... Why are they even there any way? They don't lead cheers (the band actually does better cheering) ... All they do is wave their pom-poms and climb on top of each other during time outs <sigh>
No, it's 7. Even Wikipedia has it as +7, which points out that it dates back more than 100 years.
18/2 + 7= 16 but 18/2 + 10 = 19, which makes no sense.
But, yes, obviously just a rule of thumb.