Ugly Wins Vs Not Winning | The Boneyard

Ugly Wins Vs Not Winning

cohenzone

Old Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,284
Reaction Score
24,129
So last week there was a lot of whining on the BY about an “ugly” win over Rice. That would be the same Rice that beat a pretty good Navy team yesterday. I know the loss to us caused Rice to fire the coach, but still. I know it’s futile, but i hope everybody accepts the simple truth that a win doesn’t have to be a work of art. There are no asterisks in the record books subtracting beauty points.
 
So last week there was a lot of whining on the BY about an “ugly” win over Rice. That would be the same Rice that beat a pretty good Navy team yesterday. I know the loss to us caused Rice to fire the coach, but still. I know it’s futile, but i hope everybody accepts the simple truth that a win doesn’t have to be a work of art. There are no asterisks in the record books subtracting beauty points.
I generally agree with your take. Every case is different though. For the 2024 edition of UCFB, my frustration (and whining if I'm honest) comes from seeing the extent to which QB play has clearly cost us wins/easier wins and, yes beauty points. If we look at the mean of O, D, and ST play it's hard to avoid the fact that QB play is the weakest link, and not by a little. And let's face it, top level college football still has a significant unofficial beauty contest element to it. Not gonna beat this horse anymore. Just expressing the reason for frustration (and whining if I'm being honest). I'm curious if others feel the same way.
 
.-.
So last week there was a lot of whining on the BY about an “ugly” win over Rice. That would be the same Rice that beat a pretty good Navy team yesterday. I know the loss to us caused Rice to fire the coach, but still. I know it’s futile, but i hope everybody accepts the simple truth that a win doesn’t have to be a work of art. There are no asterisks in the record books subtracting beauty points.
I honestly think the people who complain are one if the following:

1. Football fans who think every game is a P4 referendum

2. Secret football haters who are mad they are winning and would rather program seize. Ugly wins are infuriating.

3. Fans can't get over the fact that winning is more important than performance. And I don't mean that rhetorically. How you win matters in cfb, because rankings are subjective.

But, for UConn, just winning is most important now. Huskies are sindsr removed from a top 50 program, gotta chill there. Win games.
 
I would add that a significant number of complainers didn't play or coach. The W is lost on them. Yes we can and will always debate style of play, how to improve or personnel or coaching decisions. That is the right of fans who love the sport and their team. Complaining that we didn't win properly or with the right players is silly or illuminates lack of experience competing at higher than a little league level.

The Boneyard for me replaces my closed coffee shop where I would stop every day for a coffee and a newspaper. Read the newspaper, sports first of course, finish my coffee, and then head to work. Place had a regular crew of 5-10 who all could be there on a weekend or as few as 5 during the week. They were long time UConn fans whose stories were fascinating. They all had a couple of things in common, they had an opinion about every aspect of the last game, and you never heard a criticism of how we won, only "could you believe that one" when it was fluky, crazy or improbable.
 
I generally agree with your take. Every case is different though. For the 2024 edition of UCFB, my frustration (and whining if I'm honest) comes from seeing the extent to which QB play has clearly cost us wins/easier wins and, yes beauty points. If we look at the mean of O, D, and ST play it's hard to avoid the fact that QB play is the weakest link, and not by a little. And let's face it, top level college football still has a significant unofficial beauty contest element to it. Not gonna beat this horse anymore. Just expressing the reason for frustration (and whining if I'm being honest). I'm curious if others feel the same way.
The thing is, UConn’s program right now is about getting wins no matter how. We are trying to emerge from over a decade of crap and mostly losing. And trying to do it without a conference. I like an efficient machine as much as anyone - heck, I suffer with Daniel Jones - but i think we are not yet to where the way we win counts for anything. I have had seasons tickets since the year before the Rent opened. I am also old, and went to most home games as a student in the mid - 60s when UConn was a mediocre YanCon team. I just think every inch of winning is a big deal right now regardless of how. Even being competitive in losses to good teams. Everyone is entitled to how they react, i just think now isn’t the time to be fussy.
 
.-.
I honestly think the people who complain are one if the following:


3. Fans can't get over the fact that winning is more important than performance. And I don't mean that rhetorically. How you win matters in cfb, because rankings are subjective.

You seem to be disagreeing with yourself here.

You say winning is more important than performance and then contradict yourself by saying how you win matter because rankings are subjective. Which is it?

Also there is a 5th group. People who are enjoying not losing but also can't look past how abysmal the teams we are beating are. I'm also pleased that we aren't that abysmal. Lastly, we had some good opportunities to win against Duke and Wake was very gettable. And the reason we didn't was because of ... decisions. I'll leave it there.
 
3. Fans can't get over the fact that winning is more important than performance. And I don't mean that rhetorically. How you win matters in cfb, because rankings are subjective.

But, for UConn, just winning is most important now. Huskies are sindsr removed from a top 50 program, gotta chill there. Win games.

Style points matter for teams in the 10-20 ranked range hustling for the at-large bids in the playoffs. For the remaining 100 teams, few outside of each team's fandom and professional better care how you got your record. All they have time to do is scan W's and L's.
 
The 17-0 Dolphins ended their perfect season winning ugly could even say the Chiefs won ugly too when they repeated. Sports isn't a beauty contest especially football.
 
The great coaches and players strive for perfection knowing it is unattainable. There is always room for improvement. After shooting a 59 Justin Thomas said, "I left a few stokes out there." Bill Lee once said, "A perfect game is to walk every batter and pick off every one of them from first base." It's just the nature of sports.
 
The day after the season ends the only thing anyone will care about this season is the total number of wins this season. The higher the better. The rest is noise.

The last 10 seasons have had win totals of 3, 6, 1, 2, 1, 3, 3, 6, 2, 3. Posting an 8-5, 9-4, or OMG, 10-3 record would be huge for the program, P4 win or no P4 win. Next season's job would be to back up this season's total. After that P4 wins start to matter as program builders, though as one-offs they would still be a nice gift for the fanbase.
 
.-.
i think this is one of those cases where no one's wrong, per se.

  • Wins are all that matters, yes.
  • Passing game matters, yes.
  • UConn winning against REALLY BAD G5 teams will soon not be good enough for spying P4 eyes - also yes (i believe).
Eventually, SOON, we will need to beat a P4 team besides that 2022 garbage BC team who came to the Rent. And then we will need to beat more of them to silence the talk radio haters talking about "it was a one-off against a meh team".

I think boneyard "complainers" are just painfully aware that the anemic passing offense we've demonstrated will not get it done against even the worst of the P4 - this team has confirmed it perfectly so far - 0 for 3 against recognizable programs, even a lame one like WF. And the syracuse humble-pie-reality-check game is coming up real soon, barring a miraculous emergence of Nick Evers.

You're both right (be happy + complainers) - For 2024 it's good enough. It might not be good enough by next year.
 
i think this is one of those cases where no one's wrong, per se.

  • Wins are all that matters, yes.
  • Passing game matters, yes.
  • UConn winning against REALLY BAD G5 teams will soon not be good enough for spying P4 eyes - also yes (i believe).
Eventually, SOON, we will need to beat a P4 team besides that 2022 garbage BC team who came to the Rent. And then we will need to beat more of them to silence the talk radio haters talking about "it was a one-off against a meh team".

I think boneyard "complainers" are just painfully aware that the anemic passing offense we've demonstrated will not get it done against even the worst of the P4 - this team has confirmed it perfectly so far - 0 for 3 against recognizable programs, even a lame one like WF. And the syracuse humble-pie-reality-check game is coming up real soon, barring a miraculous emergence of Nick Evers.

You're both right (be happy + complainers) - For 2024 it's good enough. It might not be good enough
And I don’t particularly disagree about next year or maybe the one after. i just think we are watching a growth (hopefully) where learning to win means more than how. As far as Evers goes, obviously his passing needs a lot of work. Whether it’s his not having played much in 3 years or having that concussion that produces what we have seen so far, I guess time will tell since Mora seems intent on using him absent injury. All I know is this has been one of the more fun years of the decade and for home games, waiting for the end of the game to beat all the early departing traffic didn’t work. The half time lines to the men’s room were even getting long again.
 
We went 5 years between wins vs FBS schools (UMass doesn't count).

At this point I'm happy that we're winning games even if they're close ones against lower level G5 schools - and getting bowl-eligible in the process.
 
Last edited:
I think winning is the important thing. Beatin P4 teams is something we want to do for us, but I don’t know how essential it is. Let’s look at SMU. They play ok 1-2 P4 teams a year. Mostly lost pretty big. They are in the ACC. What Houston and SMU and the rest did was win games on a regular basis. Not P4 games. Those they played 1-2 a year and for the most part lost. We play 4. We need to win most of the non-P4 games, win an occasional P4 game, and we’ll be fine. I’d personally like us to get into a league for football, AAC or PAC would be best, and compete for championships. Maybe even get the G5 playoff slot. But we simply do not need to win 3 P4 games. We don’t even have to play 3-4 of them. We just need to win the majority of the games we play.
 
The 17-0 Dolphins ended their perfect season winning ugly could even say the Chiefs won ugly too when they repeated. Sports isn't a beauty contest especially football.

College football is definitely a beauty contest.
 
You seem to be disagreeing with yourself here.

You say winning is more important than performance and then contradict yourself by saying how you win matter because rankings are subjective. Which is it?

Also there is a 5th group. People who are enjoying not losing but also can't look past how abysmal the teams we are beating are. I'm also pleased that we aren't that abysmal. Lastly, we had some good opportunities to win against Duke and Wake was very gettable. And the reason we didn't was because of ... decisions. I'll leave it there.
Not really.

I think how you win college football matters for cfp and bowl purposes. But, with UConn in this current state, there really is no reason to care how they win.

It is so infrequent, and expectations so low, that Huskies just getting to a bowl game and a winning recirdnis critical.

We aren't really fighting for anything other than pride and an open bowl slot.

I want to win against syracuse. I'd trade 1-2 if the one win is cuse.
 
.-.
I want to win against syracuse. I'd trade 1-2 if the one win is cuse.
lol UConn WOULD beat syracuse and then turn around and lose to UMass the following week.
But i'd take that trade too... i guess?
 
I honestly think the people who complain are one if the following:

1. Football fans who think every game is a P4 referendum

2. Secret football haters who are mad they are winning and would rather program seize. Ugly wins are infuriating.

3. Fans can't get over the fact that winning is more important than performance. And I don't mean that rhetorically. How you win matters in cfb, because rankings are subjective.

But, for UConn, just winning is most important now. Huskies are sindsr removed from a top 50 program, gotta chill there. Win games.
I agree, and I wouldn’t agree if this were 20 years ago. Times are just vastly different.

This program is close to dead - people get so steamed when I say that but it’s true, we can argue the reasons, but it’s true. But that is not to say there is not a small chance that UCONN can climb out of this abyss and eventually many years from now can compete for the G5 playoff spot (I know we have to be actually in a G5 conference but I digress). Some of the things needed have nothing to do with things occurring on the field.

It doesn’t matter what the strength of schedule is, it doesn’t matter how bad the teams we beat are or how much we beat them by. It matters that we win. Because no one is going to remember if we beat a horrid Rice team by 55 or by 5 points. They will just see a W. And that’s important. It’s important to recruiting, it’s important to maybe getting some mor NIL investment. And it’s a step forward. Keep improving, not matter how little, and things can get better.
 
Fans want to see high scoring and dominate wins. If we can achieve that, it will only help growing the fanbase.
Partially true. Fans want to see winning more than anything. High scoring dominating wins don’t happen that often routinely for even most really good teams. High scoring losses are not that satisfying. Then people will bitch about the defense. Honestly, I think independents not named Notre Dame don’t regularly have the kind of years you are talking about. I’m not sure how many respected opponents out of 12 are going to be on our schedule from year to year to attract the talent that will often produce dominating, high scoring wins. We have a few of them this year and would probably need 9 FAU type teams a year to produce a lot of lopsided wins and few want that kind of schedule. I hope somehow we land in a power conference that suits football and basketball.
 
I generally agree with your take. Every case is different though. For the 2024 edition of UCFB, my frustration (and whining if I'm honest) comes from seeing the extent to which QB play has clearly cost us wins/easier wins and, yes beauty points. If we look at the mean of O, D, and ST play it's hard to avoid the fact that QB play is the weakest link, and not by a little. And let's face it, top level college football still has a significant unofficial beauty contest element to it. Not gonna beat this horse anymore. Just expressing the reason for frustration (and whining if I'm being honest). I'm curious if others feel the same way.
I’m in total agreement. I think the coaching staff could get a lot more out of this team, but bad selection of plays and in some cases players are costing the team. Although I’m happy with the record and the fact that they’ve become bowl eligible, I’d really do believe they would be a much stronger team if the coaching was better.
 
You know that two things can be true at the same time, right? You can be happy we're winning and also be disappointed that one of the most talented teams we've had in the last decade is being held back because we don't have average production from the most important position on the field
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,510
Messages
4,579,686
Members
10,488
Latest member
Djw06001


Top Bottom