HuskyHawk
The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2011
- Messages
- 33,119
- Reaction Score
- 86,340
Tulsa... Decent hoops, decent football.
Otherwise UNLV or Nevada.
Tulsa and Nevada are both good options.
Tulsa... Decent hoops, decent football.
Otherwise UNLV or Nevada.
And that being said, trips to Annapolis, Tampa and San Diego beat the heck out of Syracuse, Charlottesville, Blacksburg, Morgantown and a lot of other places.
Yeah, the ACC has 1.5 national powers. the ACC. I'd rather go to the Big 12.Obviously, UConn needs to make the best of its current plight, but any UConn fan who still thinks the NBE is a better home than the ACC is certifiably DELUSIONAL.
Yeah, the ACC has 1.5 national powers. **** the ACC. I'd rather go to the Big 12.
I don't care to hate the ACC. But ACC football is overrated. It is not much better than the "NNBE". Who do they have besides Clemson and FSU? I do enjoy regional rivalries. But if we want to win national titles, we have to align ourselves with the best to have the best opportunities. The best right now are the SEC and Big 12 and maybe the Pac-12. Would be nice if the B1G is amongst the best, but that doesn't seem to be the case anymore with their market has become the "Rust Belt".The Big 12 would be great as well. But even if the ACC is less desirable to UConn than the Big10 or 12, it doesnt have to fend off LaTech for a major bowl payday. Irrespective of whether we as UConn fans/ACC haters dont feel the ACC deserves its status, the market obviously determined that it does. And this is before you accept that the ACC will be the best hoops league, a better place for Olympic sports, and now includes the majority of the original Big East football members who if nothing else are our most obvious regional rivals. Obviously none of this is groundbreaking news, but the split betwn the "big 5" and the BE has never been greater with the new bowl system looming. We can hate the ACC all we want for being pragmatic and poaching the league, but to prefer the NBE over the ACC is DELUSIONAL.
I don't care to hate the ACC. But ACC football is overrated. It is not much better than the "NNBE". Who do they have besides Clemson and FSU? I do enjoy regional rivalries. But if we want to win national titles, we have to align ourselves with the best to have the best opportunities. The best right now are the SEC and Big 12 and maybe the Pac-12. Would be nice if the B1G is amongst the best, but that doesn't seem to be the case anymore with their market has become the "Rust Belt".
Your argument is that UConn should plan its future based on winning championships in football, and the NNBE is the best way for UConn to win a title in football?And that UConn should turn down the ACC because they are not as good as the SEC or Big12? And turn down the B1G because they are turning into the rust belt?I don't care to hate the ACC. But ACC football is overrated. It is not much better than the "NNBE". Who do they have besides Clemson and FSU? I do enjoy regional rivalries. But if we want to win national titles, we have to align ourselves with the best to have the best opportunities. The best right now are the SEC and Big 12 and maybe the Pac-12. Would be nice if the B1G is amongst the best, but that doesn't seem to be the case anymore with their market has become the "Rust Belt".
If we get a TV deal that pays at least $15 million every year, I wouldn't even be worried about that.
Plus the ACC has a guaranteed contract bowl slot in the Orange bowl, right? What's the BE's contract bowl? Oh right, we don't have one.We'd still lack "BCS" guaranteed access, so I'd still worry.
Speaking of the ACC, has the BoT meeting adjourned and the press release been released yet?!!?!!
Um, I was saying the Big 12 is the best platform to use for winning championships compared to the ACC and B1G. Maybe you should slow down and read the post.Your argument is that UConn should plan its future based on winning championships in football, and the NNBE is the best way for UConn to win a title in football?And that UConn should turn down the ACC because they are not as good as the SEC or Big12? And turn down the B1G because they are turning into the rust belt?
Have I mischaracterized your post? Because if not, RMoore is right - you are beyond delusional. This is RutgersAl territory we're talking about.
Anyway it doesn't matter, we're not getting an invite anywhere. We'll have more money than we had before, and have to hope it's enough to stay in shouting distance with the ACC schools.
Okay, I re-read it slowly. I still don't see how UConn gets an invite to the Big 12, and I still think it's crazy talk to say UConn should not go to the ACC if invited, which is what you are implying and you've said it before. An acc invite brings more money to pay a coaching staff and for recruiting, more regional rivalries, a guaranteed shot to play in the Orange Bowl instead of a non-guaranteed (i.e. worrying about being selected over an undefeated LaTech Hawaii, etc.), random game. But yeah, let's hold out for the Big12 because that makes so much more sense.Um, I was saying the Big 12 is a best platform to use for winning championships compared to the ACC and B1G. Maybe you should slow down and read the post.
"I don't care to hate the ACC. But ACC football is overrated. It is not much better than the "NNBE". Who do they have besides Clemson and FSU? I do enjoy regional rivalries."Okay, I re-read it slowly. I still don't see how UConn gets an invite to the Big 12, and I still think it's crazy talk to say UConn should not go to the ACC if invited, which is what you are implying and you've said it before. An acc invite brings more money to pay a coaching staff and for recruiting, more regional rivalries, a guaranteed shot to play in the Orange Bowl instead of a non-guaranteed (i.e. worrying about being selected over an undefeated LaTech Hawaii, etc.), random game. But yeah, let's hold out for the Big12 because that makes so much more sense.