Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="intlzncster, post: 2785117, member: 56"] That might speak more to the quality of the AAC than anything. He earned that award for his blocking ability. He was an average man to man defender. And he had trouble staying on the court. Worse, he was a black hole offensively. UCONN generally played 4 on 5 when he was on the court. That mitigates his defensive contributions. It doesn't matter what he could have become or that it was UCONN's fault for not developing. I'm just talking about what he was on the court. A good starting center will give you the defense, plus 12 and 8 with maybe a couple assists. This is coming from someone who liked Brimah, despite his faults. I'm just trying to be realistic about what he was at UCONN. [/QUOTE]