- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 103,128
- Reaction Score
- 426,238
You got to beat the best to be the best.Glad the doomsday scenario of being dumped to the 1 seeds bracket didn’t come true. There’s a huge difference between Ohio state and Wisconsin and the rest of women’s hockey.
But do avoid Wisconsin or Ohio State until final four.We are the #6 ranked team in the country. Quinnipiac is #7. We play #9 Princeton while they play #25 (the 11th seeded team in the tournament) Franklin Pierce. Why? Because the NCAA committee will not pair two teams from the same conference in a first round game.
Makes a hell of a lot of sense to penalize the #6 team while granting the #7 team a gift.
Oh, by the way, #6 UConn defeated #7 Quinnipiac in the regular season. Thanks, NCAA. The ECAC loves you.
As we should. The #6 seed should play #3 in the quarters, while #7 matches up with #2. That’s chalk.But do avoid Wisconsin or Ohio State until final four.
From the Courant article above…How is it that UConn gets Princeton and Quinnipiac gets Franklin Pierce? Outrageous!!
Yeah, I knew when I posted, but it still pisses me off. To avoid the Yale Princeton matchup. That originated long ago in men's bracketingFrom the Courant article above…
-> Quinnipiac, the ECAC champion, will play Franklin Pierce on Thursday night in the regional at Wisconsin. Yale, which lost the ECAC final, will play Minnesota-Duluth in the regional at Ohio State, as Connecticut gets three teams in the 11-team field. UConn, Quinnipiac and Yale were sixth, seventh and eighth, respectively, in the ratings index, but the NCAA looks to avoid conference rivals playing in the first round. So rather than face the 11th seed, automatic qualifier Franklin Pierce, UConn gets Princeton, ninth in NPI. <-
I explained this two days ago. It’s because the weak-kneed NCAA won’t put two teams from the same league against each other in the first round, even if it upsets conventional pairings by EARNED seeds. Since the ECAC has three teams seeded 7,8, 9 (QU, Yale, Princeton) they will not, contrary to traditional seeding, place #8 Yale against #9 Princeton in Round One. So #6 UConn gets screwed playing #9 Princeton instead of the #11 seed Franklin Pierce (ranked #25), who gets gifted to QU.How is it that UConn gets Princeton and Quinnipiac gets Franklin Pierce? Outrageous!!
Oh, I am very familiar with this bracketology. It originated with the men's tournament where the NC$$ wanted to maximize revenues and women's hockey never drew more than friends and family. Jason Moy at USCHO was the first guy to formalize it. Just pisses me off. UConn already played Princeton TWICE. (They are dangerous, btw.) I will be even MORE pissed if the game goes into OT with another game against Penn State the next day or the day after.I explained this two days ago. It’s because the weak-kneed NCAA won’t put two teams from the same league against each other in the first round, even if it upsets conventional pairings by EARNED seeds. Since the ECAC has three teams seeded 7,8, 9 (QU, Yale, Princeton) they will not, contrary to traditional seeding, place #8 Yale against #9 Princeton in Round One. So #6 UConn gets screwed playing #9 Princeton instead of the #11 seed Franklin Pierce (ranked #25), who gets gifted to QU.
It’s a travesty. But don’t expect any comment from the NCAA or ECAC.
In any reasonable tournament matchups are chalk: 1-16, 2-15, 3-14, 4-13, 5-12, 6-11 (hello UConn vs Franklin Pierce), 7-10, 8-9.
QU gets a (probable) Get-Out-of-Jail-Free pass to the quarter-finals, that UConn had EARNED.
You need cheese with your whine? The NCAA doesn’t tell you that they set brackets using straight chalk because they don’t in any sport. They consider geography so fans can get to more games and avoiding early overs-conference games where it can easily be done. (Tennis tournaments are done with 5 through 8 being drawn as if they were interchangeable by the way.)As we should. The #6 seed should play #3 in the quarters, while #7 matches up with #2. That’s chalk.