Re-read my post. Brooks was not the best player in the country last year.We've had a player as good as dillon brooks the last 3 yrs????
Didnt say he was. Just posing the question for context. And the yr before it was debatable. He was VERY good. Secondly last yr really skews those numbers in favor of altman. If ollie has a full team all yr long then those winning %'s are significantly closer. And ollie has had stacked teams??????Re-read my post. Brooks was not the best player in the country last year.
KO has been the coach of some pretty stacked teams and we've fallen below expectations.
Agreed. Altman may indeed be a better coach idk. But to say "much better" is insinuating 1 of 2 things. That altman is among the elite coaches(K, izzo, williams, Cal) or that KO is a bad coach. Neither are true. KO and Altman are pretty even imo with KO having a slight edge because of the championship.Leaving aside the argument of who's the better coach, that's a stretch. 2014 had it for sure. But all the other years? I don't see it.
I'm guessing you'd include 2016? While it did have some talent, I think it's pretty clear that team was fundamentally flawed at the PG spot. They had either a GT prototypical 2 guard or a freshman at the point. And the results showed as much. jmo
Have you watched any Oregon games to make this statement? I'm guessing you haven't - he's not wrong.
Re-read my post. Brooks was not the best player in the country last year.
Outside of Husky Nation his junior season was pretty disgusting, one of the better ones in the Big East that year.Who thought Shabazz Napier was the best player in the country before KO got him a championship?
LOL. What a hot take. Altman is a much better coach based on what?? We know you aren't basing it on championships
Did you say KO got Shabazz Napier a championship? Try the other way around.Who thought Shabazz Napier was the best player in the country before KO got him a championship?
You dont have to convince me he's a good coach. He may even be better than ollie. But "much better" he is not. Much better implies he's so much better than ollie that he'd beat ollie with a significantly less talented team, which he can not. Ollie can coach too, he's no slouch. Just ask izzo, cal, donavan, and hoiberga higher career winning percentage, consistently in the top 25, always atop the Pac 12 conference standings. He's one of six active coaches with six consecutive 20-win seasons. He is widely regarded as one of the best X's and O's coaches in the country, as well as a great in-game manager. Ollie may have won a national championship, but his coaching results besides that are average at best given the amount of talent surrounding the team in the past four years.
And who knows what would have happened last season if Oregon had Boucher for their tournament run.
Lets end this argumentYou dont have to convince me he's a good coach. He may even be better than ollie. But "much better" he is not. Much better implies he's so much better than ollie that he'd beat ollie with a significantly less talented team, which he can not. Ollie can coach too, he's no slouch. Just ask izzo, cal, donavan, and hoiberg
How about they won one together. Neither pulled all the weightDid you say KO got Shabazz Napier a championship? Try the other way around.
How about they won one together. Neither pulled all the weight
Unfortunately right now it's looking more like Bazz was the bigger reason but hopefully KO can turn that around.