- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 92,010
- Reaction Score
- 352,421
Rink dimensions are not standardized. Within reason, you can do basically whatever you want that’s around 200x85Are you saying the dimensions of the rink are not standard?
The BU broadcast team mentioned that there were no corners at Tuscano. So the dimensions are NHL spec, but the corner radius apparently can different. Maybe it was a cost savings measure, or if it was strategic then maybe meant to limit the ability of the opponent’s talent to operate efficiently as well?Rink dimensions are not standardized. Within reason, you can do basically whatever you want that’s around 200x85
I’m thinking Bernie and his partner have had 1 to many cocktailsThe BU broadcast team mentioned that there were no corners at Tuscano. So the dimensions are NHL spec, but the corner radius apparently can different. Maybe it was a cost savings measure, or if it was strategic then maybe meant to limit the ability of the opponent’s talent to operate efficiently as well?
Nice move by Tuch. He completely fooled Haider. Rare thing that.
I’ve always thought that as well….just got there from the “bahr acrost Comm. Ave.”I’m thinking Bernie and his partner have had 1 to many cocktails
Definitely true - the radius of dot to the corner boards is shorter making for what is known as a "short corner". But, I don't think that the Toscano architect, JCJ, has built hockey arenas before.The BU broadcast team mentioned that there were no corners at Tuscano. So the dimensions are NHL spec, but the corner radius apparently can different. Maybe it was a cost savings measure, or if it was strategic then maybe meant to limit the ability of the opponent’s talent to operate efficiently as well?