Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="champs99and04, post: 2759482, member: 488"] My time studying law began ten minutes ago, but I have learned that a contract can be rendered unenforceable if its terms are deemed "impossible or impracticable to carry out." This suggests to me that UConn's burden of proof is higher than people think. They don't just have to proof he committed violations, they have to prove that it would have been reasonably possible to do his job without committing any violations. Because this is a court of law and not an appeal to the NCAA, it's unlikely that a neutral third party will view this as anything other than a desperate attempt to scrabble together some extra change. [/QUOTE]