- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 4,501
- Reaction Score
- 8,020
Houston has a nice film of highlights from last year to market himself with. Just losing a year of eligibility and risking injury playing here for a bad team now.
They did beat Bama this year. So maybe?So Texas might finally become relevant?
Not a huge accomplishment this year it seems.They did beat Bama this year. So maybe?
hmmmmmmm, no.…..Schools have gotten rich off student athletes for decades, …
It will be interesting to see where Houston lands. That will give us an idea of the $$. As for the going rates, the big NIL money goes to the star players—they’re the ones who garner the attention from major corporations—not just the local laundromat. The Collectives are the Wild West.Do we have any sense at all what the going rates are for various positions and skill levels? Do we have a sense of what the current UConn players are making?
This is the simplest explanation and probably the correct one. P5 school with NIL says “Redshirt, don’t get hurt, and we’ll pay you for two years.”Anyone think, or is this already implied in this discussion, that some other school has called Houston and offered him a lot more money to play for them next year if he saved a year of eligibility? Is that the undercurrent floating around not explicitly expressed?
I don’t think Houston is getting a P5 money or a school. Just no way.It will be interesting to see where Houston lands. That will give us an idea of the $$. As for the going rates, the big NIL money goes to the star players—they’re the ones who garner the attention from major corporations—not just the local laundromat. The Collectives are the Wild West.
$300K was given to a HS senior QB in New England by an SEC school to commit. They also landed two other QB’s. That’s some hefty cash. Think UConn would ever pay that?
You sure about that? Tourny, bowl, and TV payouts…that money surely didn’t go to the students.hmmmmmmm, no.
Are your sure about that? I have heard that more than one player on our roster was offer NIL money in the offseason by Power 5 schools. Power 5 schools includes a large group of schools, many of which aren't necessarily major players in world of college football but are still recruiting players with NIL money to improve their rosters. There are definitely some Power 5 schools who could improve their roster with the addition of Houston.I don’t think Houston is getting a P5 money or a school. Just no way.
Mora is trying to get more funding for football including NIL as he should. That is his job as head coach. Of course more NIL money could potentially bring in better players, but there is talent everywhere and you have to identify it.Disagree. UConn doesn't have receivers who can get free this year because UConn's collectives do not have enough money to pay the going rate for them from the portal. That was stated openly in HCJM's last presser.
Simpson would have been nice but he followed Don Brown from Arizona to UMass. Brown got him to Arizona coming out of Trinity-Pawling.As for WRs who I don't think NIL was an issue, here are 2 who were available this cycle:
Anthony Simpson went from Arizona to UMass. From Bloomfield, CT. 19 receptions 393 yards 2 TDs
True, but there are WRs out there in the portal.Simpson would have been nice but he followed Don Brown from Arizona to UMass. Brown got him to Arizona coming out of Trinity-Pawling.
These numbers are recurring salary costs, not one time costs of acquisition?I don't know how accurate this is, but from Front Office Sports:
The top half of Power 5 starters earn an average of $45,000, data released at the 2023 NIL Summit shows, while the bottom makes an average of $15,000. The top three players on Power 5 and Big East basketball teams earn an average of $75,000.
This doesn’t necessarily suggest that basketball players are earning more than football players overall — but rather that NIL collectives have to divide their resources more among football players, given their extensive rosters.
NIL Collectives Pay Five Figures to Top College Athletes.
I would believe they are recurring costs, but I would assume players can move up or down the NIL value with performance. And, no the money is not coming for the school.These numbers are recurring salary costs, not one time costs of acquisition?
And can the institution's own funds be allocated to these payments?
People just don't seem to honor commitments to the team and teammates any more.
We have 13 scholarship LBs on the roster who have eligibility for next year and have 1 LB commit. Lose only Mitchell and Plack to graduation.Going to need LBs next year too.
my mistake . I thoought you were talking about Nebraska !They have not been elite for 15 to 20 years
I remember last year when Swenson went down a couple of times last year that we replaced him with our current LS. I guess I'm a little concerned about who is behind Jackson and Plack as I do not see the starting position group as strong as last year and having it trending this way in the future.We have 13 scholarship LBs on the roster who have eligibility for next year and have 1 LB commit. Lose only Mitchell and Plack to graduation.