UCONN to Resume Relationship With BC in Basketball and Football | Page 2 | The Boneyard

UCONN to Resume Relationship With BC in Basketball and Football

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wait...you're a UConn fan?

Outside of RU games I've always enjoyed NEastern football and I hate Cuse and BC so I sort of rooted for UConn football as my "other team"!!Why do you think I'm here so much outside of normal curiosity?Like I always said ..I'm not the enemy!
 
O My God. this was the board that shot down what in retrospect could have been a life-changing (or at least conference-changing) series with ND that would have meant going to Gillette or Meadowlands three times in seven years and of course we were above that for some crazy reason.

Not going to let this "we don't need BC" bullspit get rolling. Not on my watch. Don't listen to these jabonis Warde. Play the game. and you know what? Play it at Fenway one time -- that's ONE TIME -- to restart the series. To make a splash and let the freaking world we mean business. But only if there's absolutely even distribution of tickets. We get half the monsters, we get half the skyboxes & roof seats.
 
This board had the power to stop a fb series with ND, that was never signed? Or is,there some legislative caveat that says,UCONN home games need to be played in CT? I've, heard the Michigan AD allude to this.
 
I still love rooting for my Huskies, but I've soured overall on college sports in general over the past year or so.

But a renewed series with the folks from The Depths? Oh, that would help suck me right back in again - although I'll believe the football part of it when the ink is dry on the contract. Color me cautiously optimistic...
 
This board had the power to stop a fb series with ND, that was never signed? Or is,there some legislative caveat that says,UCONN home games need to be played in CT? I've, heard the Michigan AD allude to this.


Small, loud group of frequent posters on this board bitched and bitched and bitched and bitched about the ND series and somehow managed to create impression 'most' UConn fans were against it and got two legislators from East Hartford to lead the cause. How stupid does this look like in hindsight?
 
Looks like the earliest it could start is 2016? In honor of that, sign a 16 year deal.
 
.-.
I'm all for beating the crap out of the denisons of 'Nut Hill on a yearly basis. Scheduling a decade long contract of home & homes to start the season is fine.
But the hairs on the back of my neck bristle at the lingering thought that the Krafts will get involved to try to make this into the New England version of the "World's Largest Cocktail Party" to help reduce the service debt on the Razor. Much rather rotate home sites between the RENT & Alumni.
 
BC thing is really simple. At one point UConn had equal or more power in the relationship (particularly basketball) and now it is more in BC's favor due to UConn's conference debacle.

At the time BC defected we were pissed particularly b/c part of their defection was running from a rivalry with UConn (in order to beat or avoid going head-to-head with UConn football and legitimizing it). Unfortunately it worked, even though I'd still argue that sticking with UConn and creating a legit New England football rivalry could have been a raise all boats success. But even if BC's results in the ACC have been mixed at best, they are better off than UConn right now from a conference perspective. So UConn needs to bury the hatchet and play nice.
 
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer; especially if their nickname is Fredo.
 
Boston College vs. UCONN scheduling in all sports of a division 1A program, is a freaking no brainer. The only thing that's prevented it is clashing of tunnel vision personal egos in decision making offices of each school. THose people are long gone in CT, and are recently removed from Boston College, that this would happen again - scheduling each other in sports - especially the major money makers - is a no-brainer.

This message board is populated with nutcases. I mean nuts. If I were king, I'd send all of you nuts to make rabbit stew.

 
Pride goet before the fall.(its not cometh)
After what the BC AD bragged about have we lost all self-respect.
Our AD should be fired and replaced by someone who actually has pride in the institution they work for.


Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
Well, I agree with the conclusion, though not necessarily the premise. There are a whole lot of reasons our AD should be replaced with someone who has pride in the Institution he's representing. Not so sure that playing BC is one, though. this is actutally a game that should have never ended. But with new people at both institutions renewing it makes sense for all parties.
 
.-.
Except that Rutgers, Syracuse, and even UMass didn't fill it.
I'd put money on the fact that a home game vs those three will fill the Rent more than any single home AAC game will. Who would fans rather see us play? I think it's rather obvious, especially for the casual fans.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
 
BC screwed UConn as recently as several months ago. They had the daggers out.

That being said, consider 2 points:

1. When you beat BC on the field, you take away their ability to club you over the head in the boardrooms repeatedly. UConn has big wins against Virginia and Maryland from that conference recently, and they went toe-to-toe with UNC and NC State. They more than took care of business against Cuse and Pitt, while going .500 against Louisville. This probably means that they can go 50/50 against BC as well, but with some incentive, do much better than that. Beating BC will not mean much to the outside world, but when BC stands up in the boardroom and complains about UConn again, they will look like even bigger fools than they already are. Not that this ever stopped them before.

2. UConn is going to struggle to schedule home-and-homes against BCS teams. Schedule all the home-and-homes you can. Ideally, the BC series would become an annual thing.
 
BC screwed UConn as recently as several months ago. They had the daggers out.

That being said, consider 2 points:

1. When you beat BC on the field, you take away their ability to club you over the head in the boardrooms repeatedly. UConn has big wins against Virginia and Maryland from that conference recently, and they went toe-to-toe with UNC and NC State. They more than took care of business against Cuse and Pitt, while going .500 against Louisville. This probably means that they can go 50/50 against BC as well, but with some incentive, do much better than that. Beating BC will not mean much to the outside world, but when BC stands up in the boardroom and complains about UConn again, they will look like even bigger fools than they already are. Not that this ever stopped them before.

2. UConn is going to struggle to schedule home-and-homes against BCS teams. Schedule all the home-and-homes you can. Ideally, the BC series would become an annual thing.

And more importantly, you build a freaking bridge to a potential ally. We need to flip enemies to allies in the ACC. There is still an odd number of teams in the ACC. They have room for one more. Flipper is gone. It's time to do this. It would be good for UConn, BC and FBS football in New England generally.
 
Well, I agree with the conclusion, though not necessarily the premise. There are a whole lot of reasons our AD should be replaced with someone who has pride in the Institution he's representing. Not so sure that playing BC is one, though. this is actutally a game that should have never ended. But with new people at both institutions renewing it makes sense for all parties.
This is a no-brainer in any sport. The ground work is already laid for the rivalry, There is already animosity between the two fan bases, and it takes care of HFD requirement of playing a team in a Have conference.
 
Small, loud group of frequent posters on this board bitched and bitched and bitched and bitched about the ND series and somehow managed to create impression 'most' UConn fans were against it and got two legislators from East Hartford to lead the cause. How stupid does this look like in hindsight?
The compactness of the state allows for meaningful home games to be played in larger adjoining media areas without to much inconvienence.
ND was a no brainer. There are a few others who fall into this category. These games should be pursued.

But only a nut-case would confuse BC and ND.
(Def of nut-case : someone who's opinion differs from yours)


Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
 
I wouldn't trust BC to schedule football games with us. What is their incentive? You know Addazio is slamming us and our conference when talking to recruits who we've also had genuine interest in. They just added somewhat regional rivals in Cuse and Pitt to their league so it's not like they don't have any northeast rivals now.

I mean I get that they want to play us in hoops but I'm not sure they want to play us enough to start scheduling football games with us. Especially considering how good their hoops league is now. I hope I'm wrong.

And I hope we don't do a hoops deal with them before football is included. Don't fall for them saying lets do hoops for the next 8 years and in 2016 we'll see how our football schedule is. If thats the case tell them to call us when their football sched is opened and we'll discuss hoops and football.
 
.-.
I wouldn't trust BC to schedule football games with us. What is their incentive? You know Addazio is slamming us and our conference when talking to recruits who we've also had genuine interest in. They just added somewhat regional rivals in Cuse and Pitt to their league so it's not like they don't have any northeast rivals now.

I mean I get that they want to play us in hoops but I'm not sure they want to play us enough to start scheduling football games with us. Especially considering how good their hoops league is now. I hope I'm wrong.

And I hope we don't do a hoops deal with them before football is included. Don't fall for them saying lets do hoops for the next 8 years and in 2016 we'll see how our football schedule is. If thats the case tell them to call us when their football sched is opened and we'll discuss hoops and football.


Frankly I could not care less what their motivation is. They need us to create a buzz in their media market, where they're about 20th on the totem pole. The bi-annual visits of Clemson Florida State and Virginia Tech sure ain't doing it. Don't care if Addazio is ripping UConn, that's part of the game. UConn has three times as many NFL draftees in recent years. If PP isn't selling that, there there really is no hope for him.

But agree, there definitely has to be firm linkage between hoop & football games. Trust but verify.
 
We better have bc football in contract for games before we ever take the court for bball.

Playing them while in the aac shoots the invite us to the acc and we will burst there attendance and views argument. The whole thing was uconn would have to play bc instead of the Cold War. It would be a big rival game that would energize the region football wise. What bc is missing blah blah. Now if u play them OOC then that argument never holds.

Whatever, you guys keep supporting warde and what he's doing.

I say not a dam soccer or baseball game until we either get a acc invite or a b10/12 one and then can make them look up at us and switch it around a bit.
 
UConn basketball is not in need of a BC hoops game.

UConn football needs a BC game more than BC football.

Knowing how utterly screwed UConn has gotten in the past two years, I fully expect manuel to sign a bb series, probably even throw in a girl's series, too, but do nothing for football.

So in the end we reward BC with our blue blood programs and get shafted in the one sport that counts the most.
 
Frankly I could not care less what their motivation is. They need us to create a buzz in their media market, where they're about 20th on the totem pole. The bi-annual visits of Clemson Florida State and Virginia Tech sure ain't doing it. Don't care if Addazio is ripping UConn, that's part of the game. UConn has three times as many NFL draftees in recent years. If PP isn't selling that, there there really is no hope for him.
But agree, there definitely has to be firm linkage between hoop & football games. Trust but verify.

I think you're misunderstanding what I wrote. I'm not asking what their incentive is. I'm saying I don't believe they want to play us in football and wouldn't trust them with any hoops contract without football included.

Personally I believe that what Addazio is saying to recruits about us is what they're attitude will be if/when they say anything about scheduling football games with us.

Hope I'm wrong though.
 
UConn football needs a BC game more than BC football.

Might have been true in 2001-2004. Wasn't true at all 2007-2010.
2013+ it's mutually beneficial. BCS home games are must for UConn and BC needs a game it thinks it can win occasionally that isn't FCS and will sell some tickets.

No neutral site games until demand is demonstrated. Each team could use the home game.


Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
 
BC screwed UConn as recently as several months ago. They had the daggers out.

That being said, consider 2 points:

1. When you beat BC on the field, you take away their ability to club you over the head in the boardrooms repeatedly. UConn has big wins against Virginia and Maryland from that conference recently, and they went toe-to-toe with UNC and NC State. They more than took care of business against Cuse and Pitt, while going .500 against Louisville. This probably means that they can go 50/50 against BC as well, but with some incentive, do much better than that. Beating BC will not mean much to the outside world, but when BC stands up in the boardroom and complains about UConn again, they will look like even bigger fools than they already are. Not that this ever stopped them before.

2. UConn is going to struggle to schedule home-and-homes against BCS teams. Schedule all the home-and-homes you can. Ideally, the BC series would become an annual thing.
You make so good points.
I 'm an Old School Blue Collar Lower Naugatuck Valley type.
We don't quit and we don't forget.
If UConn were in a major conference I could see the resumption of this series at a future time. Right now the perception will be Big 5 BC agrees to play a desparate Ct
That thought really bothers me.



Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
 
.-.
How many of us would rather be waterboarded than send our kids to BC? How many would make a personal point to paint Alumni Stadium blue and white? How many would love to rip apart BC at their home stadium and start a long, incessant "little brother" chant that echoes throughout the stadium to remind them in no uncertain terms who really is "New England's team?"

UConn football needs a rival. It does not have one. I know Rutgers can qualify, but honestly ask, are they a rival, or do we call them one because there are no better options? Rutgers and UConn have played very close (agonizing) games over the past few years, and that certainly helps, but rivalries are natural. Our "rivalry" with Rutgers always felt more like a "well, who honestly is a rival?" designation rather than a true blood hate rivalry. I like beating Rutgers as much as the next person, but honestly, if we do not ever play them again (unless we go to the B1G!), I sincerely will not care.

We hate BC. BC hates us. We are within 100 or so miles of one another, and we have a well-documented antipathy that extends beyond the players and the fans. Few schools have that kind of resentment toward one another.

College sports are built on rivalries. Where was our men's basketball team before we had Syracuse, Georgetown, and Pitt to hate? Those schools, and the desperation to beat one another lifted UConn basketball from a regional power into a national contender on a regular basis. Fans need games to circle on the calendar. UConn football has never had that.

We circled the Pitt, Cuse, G'Town basketball games on the calendar. Pitt and Cuse football games never carried that cache or angst. BC provides that more than any of those schools ever could or would. The local coverage of a UConn/BC game, and the storylines would generate a buzz for the game that only the Notre Dame and Michigan games ever did.

The passion for UConn in this state is pound for pound strong enough to rival any other fan base. It may not be the largest, but it certainly stacks up. To those of us who went to the Rutgers game at the Rent in 2007, we were playing our first game as a nationally ranked team at home, against Rutgers in primetime (with the representatives of the Sugar or Fiesta Bowl in attendance). I have never seen a UConn crowd at a football game like that. Something was at stake, the game MATTERED for national purposes, and the fans rose up, and responded in a way that I remember to this day.

We need that kind of game every single year if we cannot get it every single week. The more of them we have, the bigger, and more passionate UConn fans become for the football team. The BC game will matter. We have talked about it in hypotheticals for years. Seeing it live will be standing room only, and we will be able to hurl the boos and hate we have pent up for years in person. This game must happen. UConn football is desperate for it. That said, duckK BC!
 
I get your point but I as a NJ native and RU fan feel no one in NY/NJ care about a BC/UConn rivalry*at least yet* and Boston already don't watch BC!!Not to mention the fact NJ alone w/o the NY/PA and FF county fringes has as much population and exposure as Connecticut and Massachusetts together in a condensed area AND CARES about football which outside of Conn, NEngland don't!Either you want to claim your part of the NY/NJ market or just a pass by state going either to NY or Boston?The NY market is the stage that I would want caring and what stoked my interest in UConn football as before you came into the FB BE I cared little about BC and less about Connecticut's FB team!And remember this, it hasn't even happened yet and your already making BC fan's smile with your admittance of their relevance to you all ?UConn DOESN'T NEED BC to be relevant !! You can stand on your own two feet now! To the impartial observer it look's like you sent up the white flag but that's JMO!!Outside of that I think its a blood rivalry with the potential to be Backyard Brawl 2!!But too much power is in BC's hand's right now and hopefully if the B1G pick's you up the shoe will be on the other foot!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: pj
I get your point but I as a NJ native and RU fan feel no one in NY/NJ care about a BC/UConn rivalry*at least yet* and Boston already don't watch BC!!Not to mention the fact NJ alone w/o the NY/PA and FF county fringes has as much population and exposure as Connecticut and Massachusetts together in a condensed area AND CARES about football which outside of Conn, NEngland don't!Either you want to claim your part of the NY/NJ market or just a pass by state going either to NY or Boston?The NY market is the stage that I would want caring and what stoked my interest in UConn football as before you came into the FB BE I cared little about BC and less about Connecticut's FB team!And remember this, it hasn't even happened yet and your already making BC fan's smile with your admittance of their relevance to you all ?UConn DOESN'T NEED BC to be relevant !! You can stand on your own two feet now! To the impartial observer it look's like you sent up the white flag but that's JMO!!Outside of that I think its a blood rivalry with the potential to be Backyard Brawl 2!!But too much power is in BC's hand's right now and hopefully if the B1G pick's you up the shoe will be on the other foot!!
 
@And may I add, I also hate the arrogance of BC as much as that other small upstate private known as "Cuse" and believe it not BC may need this game as badly as you guys do as their isolation has taken them out of the conversation so that EVEN the ACC wonders why they picked them up?EF BC!!The future is state flagship U's!
 
BC is irrelevant. They know playing UConn in any sport sells more tickets because we will pack their houses. Then they will use some sort of statistical book-cooking to show increased attendance/interest and present it to Delany and to get a B1G invite ahead of us. Then we can all watch in disgust as Cincinnati, Temple, USF and UCF are added to the ACC (each citing a completely new and different reason as to why they are better than UConn) and we are left behind to foster our growing rivalry with Tulane and friggin' Memphis. F BC. F the ACC. Warde better be approaching this one with extreme caution. BC can not be trusted.
 
BC is irrelevant. They know playing UConn in any sport sells more tickets because we will pack their houses. Then they will use some sort of statistical book-cooking to show increased attendance/interest and present it to Delany and to get a B1G invite ahead of us. Then we can all watch in disgust as Cincinnati, Temple, USF and UCF are added to the ACC (each citing a completely new and different reason as to why they are better than UConn) and we are left behind to foster our growing rivalry with Tulane and friggin' Memphis. F BC. F the ACC. Warde better be approaching this one with extreme caution. BC can not be trusted.

@I was thinking along your line's...whats in it for BC?Since when do "they do UConn a favor"!!BE VERY WARY or they may have B1G eye's!They may sense or worse know were on the B1G's radar?
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,352
Messages
4,566,775
Members
10,469
Latest member
xxBlueChips


Top Bottom