I go back to what I said before this series -- taking the catchers out of the equation, we have 9 position players for 8 slots. Maybe injuries make that not a problem, assuming that most times at least one of them will be unavailable, but either (i) one of the 8 is the odd man out, only making spot appearances (because Penders' history is other than giving catchers a rest he likes having the same players play almost every game) , or (ii) he can have 9 starters for 8positions by just giving everyone a game off every other week and using Smith's versatility to move people around defensively. Obviously, the latter may come with a price defensively.
I didn't know Ferrer was all banged up coming into the weekend, but I seriously doubt he is going to be the odd man out limited to making periodic appearances. He is going to play most days. And, while Ferrer is not a great OF, Christian is not likely to be the odd man out either. Which means that if I'm Smith or Huber, I better be hitting before the West Coast swing before either (i) Christian slides back to second and Ferrer DHs, or (ii) Dana moves to 1B, which I think he has experience at from Seton Hall, and Ferrer moves into the OF.
Don't get me wrong -- having one too many players who "need" to start is not a bad thing. But I don't see Ferrer's bat being out of the lineup too often, I don't think Simmons (even ignoring that he got off to a good start with the bat) has a short lease given the defensive issues of moving Stock to CF. But besides Simmons, the only two guys who haven't proven that they are capable high division 1 bats are Smith and Huber. Not to say they won't be -- I know everyone is high on both of them. I just always lean to folks who have proven bats versus those with potential.