- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 91,801
- Reaction Score
- 351,378
So the program designed by a panel of senior age professors for 18 to 22 year olds failed. What a surprised. Maybe next time get input up front from your subjects.
Amazing how they try to spin failure.
So what are you saying? The football team should have been put in a dorm building and kept away from the general student population under lock and key? Word is some of the athletes decided to "socialize" leading to this moment.Amazing how they try to spin failure.
I agree. There shouldn't be in person classes and fall sports should be canceled nationwide. Good to see we agree on something.
I will respond to your question. The idea that 18-22 year old football players would accept isolation since 7/1 is ridiculous when there is no meaningful health threat to them. Why can’t they socialize with other students? We have no idea if any of them is actually sick? They may be doing what needs to naturally be done - building up herd immunity both by antibodies but more importantly by T-cells. The folks who should be isolated are the old dudes sitting on these committees making up these foolish policies for young people, that are not backed up by data or science. Unfortunately under this University President the students have no voice or input. A disgrace.So what are you saying? The football team should have been put in a dorm building and kept away from the general student population under lock and key? Word is some of the athletes decided to "socialize" leading to this moment.
Good point. But, what the university calls online classes generally aren’t. They are powerpoints posted on a website. No lecture or interactivity - so it’s even worse than what you think.That seems to be the message much of higher education is sending. What I find interesting is that they don't seem to realize they are also sending another message.
That message is "in person classes do not add much value". If students get an adequate education from watching on line lectures from their rooms on campus or at home, why do those lectures have to come from UConn professors?
Do you know this because you are attending classes or just making broad generalizations/guesses??Good point. But, what the university calls online classes generally aren’t. They are powerpoints posted on a website. No lecture or interactivity - so it’s even worse than what you think.
You keep forgetting the real reason football has been cancelled....LIABILITY. The schools that arent playing have decided they can't reconcile their own state health best practice guidelines for COVid with the operational needs to run a competitive football team (yeah we could play this fall, but we might have games where the walks on have 10 starting position because of COVid outbreaks). And the LIABILITY issue is with the long term, not the short term. The long term remains unknown.I will respond to your question. The idea that 18-22 year old football players would accept isolation since 7/1 is ridiculous when there is no meaningful health threat to them. Why can’t they social with other students? We have no idea if any of them is actually sick? They may be doing what needs to naturally be done - building up herd immunity both by antibodies but more importantly by T-cells. The folks who should be isolated are the old dudes sitting on these committees making up these foolish policies for young people, that are not backed up by data or science. Unfortunately under this University President the students have no voice or input. A disgrace.
View attachment 57891
Good point. But, what the university calls online classes generally aren’t. They are powerpoints posted on a website. No lecture or interactivity - so it’s even worse than what you think.