While the efficiency stats in BM’s graph don’t necessarily calculate as I understand efficiency, it is usually a simple formula: pts+rbs+ast+stls+bl-missed shots-missed ft’s-turnovers.Excuse me, please. Could you explain what player efficiency is in a very succinct manner without using big words and just plain simple to a very old man? Thank you, very much.
....Could you explain what player efficiency is....
....a simple formula: pts+rbs+ast+stls+bl-missed shots-missed ft’s-turnovers....
A few of the passes, as Uconn was being pressured, I wondered if some of the player (Irwin was one) had vision problems. It appeared they tried to throw the ball through the defender. I know, from experience, sometime you are so determined to make a pass the defender isn't seen. But that happens usually only ONCE.One of the aspects of the past few games that has been somewhat disappointing is Kyla’s decision making. Her passing, particularly from the high post, has been a strong point. More recently though, she has tried to force passes, leading to a number of turnovers. Even though Kyla has started 7 games in a row, the Huskies are still searching for that 5th starter imo. I suspect Anna will be up to bat again soon.
You have to admit the numbers were pretty, looked nice all lined up that way. Then it took effort to put them all together from the game stats. B for effort at least.While the efficiency stats in BM’s graph don’t necessarily calculate as I understand efficiency, it is usually a simple formula: pts+rbs+ast+stls+bl-missed shots-missed ft’s-turnovers.
...B for effort at least...
While the efficiency stats in BM’s graph don’t necessarily calculate as I understand efficiency, it is usually a simple formula: pts+rbs+ast+stls+bl-missed shots-missed ft’s-turnovers.