UCONN NC Teams Quarterfinal Results.

[meyers7]

Well the polls have closed and you have spoken. (can't see how many voted, only the percentage), but here are the results. Thanks for the votes.

2002 Team 97%
2004 Team 3%

2000 Team 66%
2010 Team 34%

1995 Team 77%
2003 Team 23%

2013 Team 9%
2009 Team 91%

On to the Semi's. I'll put them up shortly.

(It's actually working out pretty much the way I divided them up. )

 

[UcMiami]

I think there needs to be an minimum age requirement imposed on voters - no one who is younger than 40 can be allowed to vote because they are too young to have fully appreciated that 1995 team! can't believe a team that fielded Lobo, Wolters, Eliot, Rizzotti, Sales, and Berube didn't trounce DT and the DTettes. Find the 2000 vs. 2010 results a bit too close as well. There is definitely a generational bias at work - too many of these young whippersnappers around!

 

[SWHuskyFan]

I voted for the 2010 team and I think that vote can be defended. There were some pretty good players on that team and I seem to remember them winning a lot of games in a row.

Perhaps we should be worried about a generational bias favoring the earlier teams as well.

P.S. I am over 40.

 

[meyers7]

I think there needs to be an minimum age requirement imposed on voters - no one who is younger than 40 can be allowed to vote because they are too young to have fully appreciated that 1995 team! can't believe a team that fielded Lobo, Wolters, Eliot, Rizzotti, Sales, and Berube didn't trounce DT and the DTettes. Find the 2000 vs. 2010 results a bit too close as well. There is definitely a generational bias at work - too many of these young whippersnappers around!

77% to 23% is a pretty good win. What exactly do you consider "trouncing"?

 

[UcMiami]

77% to 23% is a pretty good win. What exactly do you consider "trouncing"?

Well something like Uconn's win loss record against Seton Hall over the last 23 years which I believe stands at 23+ to 0 or 100%/0%

Hey - just having fun with this!