Yes, IF the actual seeding decisions reflect the AP poll as we would become a 2 seed and likely in the Bridgeport Region.So does the prospective higher ranking in the appropriate "poll" get the team out of the Spokane region?
I suspect the other BY Bracketology experts will chime in, BUT... from my view...So does the prospective higher ranking in the appropriate "poll" get the team out of the Spokane region?
1. No.So does the prospective higher ranking in the appropriate "poll" get the team out of the Spokane region?
Massey puts a lot of emphasis on strength of schedule. Four of the top five ranked Massey teams are in the top 5 in schedule strength. Only Louisville is in the top 5 with an SOS out of the top 20 (#23). But their 21-2 record & their victory over UCONN keeps them ahead of the Huskies.Massey ratings has UConn at #5
UCONN can pass #6 Arizona and/or #7 Indiana in the AP poll. They are only a few points behind each team.I suspect the other BY Bracketology experts will chime in, BUT... from my view...
IF the Committee follows the standard "S" curve, AND their ranking matches the AP (which it probably won't match exactly), UCONN being #8 would place them as the 4th 2 seed... which would likely move them to the Greensboro region... with SoCarolina as the #1... Hmmmmm. What other manipulation will the Committee come up with?
ON THE OTHER HAND.... IF the Committee ranking matches current Massey, #2 in Bridgeport is a good possibility.
…4. The NCAA is inscrutable.1. No. Doesn't get us out of Spokane.
2. Polls don't determine seeding or bracketing.
3. Even if they did, there's a month of games left to play.
Some love Caitlin's play.How is Iowa ranked 25, or ranked at all, when they lost yesterday.
LOL...you're being kind. But illogical is the best description.…4. The NCAA is inscrutable.
…5. The NCAA is illogical.
…6. The NCAA is scrofulous.
Of course our NET ranking looks pretty good too:1. No.
2. Polls don't determine seeding or bracketing.
3. Even if they did, there's a month of games left to play.
So does the prospective higher ranking in the appropriate "poll" get the team out of the Spokane region?
That's nice, but not decisive either. UNC is not in the committee's top 16, much less their top 5.
You mean their loss on the road to the #6 team? Why in the world would that drop them from the top 25?How is Iowa ranked 25, or ranked at all, when they lost yesterday.
I suspect the other BY Bracketology experts will chime in, BUT... from my view...
IF the Committee follows the standard "S" curve, AND their ranking matches the AP (which it probably won't match exactly), UCONN being #8 would place them as the 4th 2 seed... which would likely move them to the Greensboro region... with SoCarolina as the #1... Hmmmmm. What other manipulation will the Committee come up with?
ON THE OTHER HAND.... IF the Committee ranking matches current Massey, #2 in Bridgeport is a good possibility.
Believe me I was NOT saying any of my reply was a "given"... and it ASSUMED they follow standard "S" Curve.I’d be very surprised if the powers to be put us in either s Carolina’s or stanfords region. They want that matchup if it occurs to be in the final four!
Not decisive, but definitely informative.That's nice, but not decisive either. UNC is not in the committee's top 16, much less their top 5.
Apparently no one is good enough to pass them.How does Notre Dame go from 20th to 19th after loosing to an unranked team?? And how does Tennessee go from 7 to 13th after loosing to unranked University of Florida and 10th ranked Uconn?? And how on God's green earth is Iowa still ranked.