There is still physical contact in both sports - One can catch the flu from another in both sports
Singles tennis has two people playing and it is possible for one to catch something from the other - a whole lot more remote but still possible
You would explain it but you can’t. I don’t even disagree with dropping football. The season was over anyway with the games lost. If UConn truly cancelled to protect the kids then they’d cancel ALL fall sports now. When a member of any fall sports team contracts COVID I’ll wait for your “explanation” lol
I'm not assuming anything. I'm looking at a program with a dwindling schedule and no legit options to backfill for this year. Had Uconn been in a conference they would be "playing" until told otherwise. They took a bad situation and spun it to get a little good press. Nothing wrong with that. Every school in America would have done the same under similar circumstances. I'm sure that Uconn/Randy care for their players, but they don't have a monopoly on doing so.
Show me where I constantly trash the program - seriously, do it. I am a LONG time season ticket holder for football and hoops. And, I agree with them ditching the season because we lost so many games it'd be an exhibition anyway. I am however questioning the AD/school for not cancelling all fall sports. The AD made the final decision to go through with cancelling the season and said they wanted to be sure to protect the players. That's good. But why are we not cancelling fall sports too? Field hockey, soccer, volleyball, etc. Those kids need the same protection. My daughter played field hockey for 10+ years and my son played volleyball for that long as well. Both sports involve contact and players in very close proximity of each other. Traveling to PA, DC, RI, VA, NE, NY, IL, IN, etc doesnt sound like the best plan given the statements made by the school in the last few days. Unless of course they can guarantee that not one kid will get sick from this. Football is more challenging with the amount of kids - no doubt. But, if the school is throwing itself out there as a "leader" in all this in order to protect every student athlete that puts on a UConn jersey, then cancel everything. If they don't then there is def. a point to be made that the only reason they dropped the football season was because they knew they weren't going to have any games left. If it's about that then say it - dont try to spin in and say we did it for the kids safety unless you take the next step and include the athletes in the other sports as well. If UConn was in the Big Ten would we have cancelled now for the safety of the kids and been a leader? This was and is always about money and the lack of any games.You should try the search function before putting words in other posters' mouths. I was in favor of playing football this year btw, but not with a 10-11 game schedule against 10-11 different schools from all over the country. The P5 scheduling plan is reckless and has a high potential for disaster. I want no part of it or anything that looks like it.
If, in refusing to do something so obviously reckless and stupid, UConn can also make the P5 look dangerous and greedy, it seems like a win/win.
Or I can be like you, and trash the program non-stop even when they do the right thing.
It appears to me that there will be great rejoicing in the ACC. BC and the ACC have succeeded in their long time goal of the destruction of the University of Connecticut athletics. They and other P5's could now forbid any nonconference games for the forseeable future in all sports. We will see.And...the statement needs to be sold as a strong pro athlete statement. and re sold.
To counter that other strong statement that some twitterati/ and journalists have been interpreting as "We are UConn and it's only football. We are awaiting basketball season".
Correct!! All this over-the-top concern for the health of these young men is actually nauseating. The reason why we are not playing this season comes down to dollars. Paying for the tests and the other monitoring and precautions costs dollars, losing P5 games costs dollars, finding teams to play may cost dollars, etc., etc. As the previous poster mentioned, simply question that cuts through all the crap, if we were in the B1G, ACC of even the AAC would we be canceling the season? Easy answer to that question, of course not. What was the administration's reason for not canceling the other fall sports, it had nothing to do with the physical nature of football or anything related to the actual games, the answer was that it was a BE call. Let's just hope they don't use COVID as an excuse to downgrade or eliminate the program. Does anybody honestly think this administration is above hiding behind COVID to make that type of decision?So you believe that this move was altruistic? Yeah no. Its because you are at 6 games and falling fast. If Uconn were in The ACC or B1G, they would be on board with playing games until the conference said otherwise. All this will be moot soon enough once regular students get on campus and cases spike. Hopefully we'll get football back by 2021.
People are just calling out the real reason the season was canceled.UConn can't even make the right call without getting stick from some. Funny, really.
This whole thing will at some point work it's way through and then we'll all be Monday morning quarterbacks no matter which side of the fence you're on.
I’m guessing Eddie Rodriguez of the Red Sox is a pretty good athlete. He is out for the season with heart issues related to Covid. Heard a presentation with an local infectious disease doc on Monday. She was talking about the inflammation problems that are a complication of this infection mainly from the body’s reaction to fight it. 4 major areas it seems to impact are heart, lungs, brain and testes. It is why folks who are “not seriously ill” from this might have longer term issues and why you hear of people who seem over the virus but have problems weeks or even months later.My response to the “they are young athletes the risk from serious outcomes from Covid are non existent” talking points is what about offensive linemen? They are 300 pounds and would be considered high risk.
unfortunately we are seeing what can happen:
Indiana Freshman O Lineman Seriously Ill
And all because of money. The Big Ten, SEC, PAC-12, Big 12 and ACC should be ashamed of themselves.
A little off topic here but parents and athletes may see UCONN as a more desirable place to play because they truly care about the student-athlete. Is that a bad thing if it comes to be?I'm not assuming anything. I'm looking at a program with a dwindling schedule and no legit options to backfill for this year. Had Uconn been in a conference they would be "playing" until told otherwise. They took a bad situation and spun it to get a little good press. Nothing wrong with that. Every school in America would have done the same under similar circumstances. I'm sure that Uconn/Randy care for their players, but they don't have a monopoly on doing so.
How about, "It was a complicated call involving a number of factors, and upon weighing them all, UConn determined that for the safety of their players and to remain fiscally responsible to tax payers and donors, they have decided to cancel the season."?People are just calling out the real reason the season was canceled.
The P5 doesn't listen to the NCAA. Bill Self is threatning legal action against them if they sanction his program for cheating. I wonder if the schools outside sometimes wonder if its worth sticking with the association. Maybe just keep March Madness as your golden goose and let them do their own thing in basketball.The P5's behavior in the pandemic shows the need for a stronger NCAA.
UConn discussion starts @ 2:06:54ish
Yeah, just like the blue chippers come to UConn for their academic programs. Watch out USC, Penn State, Michigan, Alabama, Florida, et al. Yes, UConn cares - but that's not the point in this claim. The point is, UConn will not upgrade their current level of recruiting because they have put the players first. They will just position themselves better against Stony Brook, Maine, Buffalo and so forth.A little off topic here but parents and athletes may see UCONN as a more desirable place to play because they truly care about the student-athlete. Is that a bad thing if it comes to be?
Only question now is when do they cancel the men's basketball season? I mean, I think they'll have to. If they're worried about spreading the disease in an outdoor stadium with the wind blowing in 40 or 50 degree weather, then playing basketball where everyone guards someone else very closely wearing small sweaty uniforms in a closed environment like a gym with coaches telling their defenders to "don't let him score, I want you to get in his face", is ringing the dinner bell for the little Covid buggers. If they don't cancel it, then it's hypocrisy raised to the nth power.Cancelling the season is the right move, especially given how irresponsible the P5 is setting up the football season. Going first was brilliant. Be a leader, take a stand for the athletes, and showcase how irresponsible the P5 are behaving.
Playing a 10 or 11 game season against 11 different teams over a wide geographic area while 100+ people associated with each program are socializing at a university is going to fail. It is not a question of if, just when. I hope it does not have catastrophic consequences, but it could.
UConn really stuck it to a lot of people in major college athletics today. If the P5 goes through with their plans, they will be exposing their athletes to a huge risk that UConn was not willing to do. They will also be exposing the leadership of these programs to huge legal liability now that an FBS school decided it wasn't safe to play. If they don't play, they will look weak for caving to pressure.
This was the right decision for player safety, and the right decision strategically.
Only question now is when do they cancel the men's basketball season? I mean, I think they'll have to. If they're worried about spreading the disease in an outdoor stadium with the wind blowing in 40 or 50 degree weather, then playing basketball where everyone guards someone else very closely wearing small sweaty uniforms in a closed environment like a gym with coaches telling their defenders to "don't let him score, I want you to get in his face", is ringing the dinner bell for the little Covid buggers. If they don't cancel it, then it's hypocrisy raised to the nth power.