Rico444
In the mix for six
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 8,818
- Reaction Score
- 31,130
Man, Louis CK does everything!
It's a wonder that there are very, very few good analysts out there, given the size of the MCBB market. The best are probably regional guys here or there, but I can't come up with someone of whom I think, "I've got to hear what this guy says about..."
The only top 25 team we've beaten is Florida. We beat them by 1. At home. With them missing key players. And we needed a 4 point play on a questionable foul call to do it. And a last 4/10ths of a second shot to win it.
.....
In 11, while we had losses, we had the components to make a run - great point, very serviceable big man, excellent back up point, great defenders all around, excellent rebounding 4 (miss you Scoe), veteran leader (Bev!). Point is, we looked VERY good on paper, even if we had 9 or 10 losses.
1. - We beat Florida. Period. Patrick Young had the greatest game of his life and we still beat them . . . .
2.- This team is miles ahead of the '11 team in terms of projecting a national championship. There was a reason everyone thought that season was a miracle. They were all underclassmen, they shot 33% from 3, the only player that shot 40% from 3 was Bev and he only made seven 3's all year. We had nothing like Kromah or Giffey coming off the bench -- Bev, your veteran leader, averaged about 8 minutes and less than 2 points a game. . . . To think that this year's team isn't a better bet to win a championship is totally revisionist history.
1. Patrick Young had the "greatest game of his life" because our centers suck so bad. Is that not obvious? Is that not as plain as can be? Is that not a verification of the theory that this team has a giant hole that likely makes it impossible for it to advance to the finals? Do you have any doubt in your mind that any competent big men are going to eat our lunches this year? Even incompetent ones.
2. Your points here all all off.
They weren't all underclassman. Okwandu - a critical puzzle piece, was a senior. Bev - a very important team leader, was a senior. Kemba was a Junior. Sure, the team was young, which made the run more unlikely, but age wasn't the critical factor.
Shooting from 3 wasn't a critical factor. So what we shot 33% from 3? That's equivalent to 50% from 2.
We had nothing like Kromah or Giffey coming off the bench? We, in fact, HAD Giffey coming off the bench. Sure, not senior year Giffey, but we had dependable bench play (Bev, Bazz, Okwandu, Giffey).
I'm not revising anything. 2011 was a great run, but we had a complete team with talent at the critical positions - great point guard with a very good back up, very good big man to defend and rebound and a good back up, excellent shooting guard, and so on.
We have a major hole in our team this year. Center.
It's the elephant in the room. CENTER.
We have very close to ZERO talent at the center position.
Look at it this way . . .
Oriakhi, Okwandu, and Wolf combined for about 14 points and 13 boards a game in 2011.
Olander, Nolan, and Brimah are going for about 8 and 5 a game, and that's mostly through cupcake season.
Further, ONB are a defensive liability for the most part, whereas OOW provided serviceable defense.
The conclusion is straight forward - the 3 point magic will wane when we play stiff competition who will not give us quite as many open 3s, and our relatively poor rebounding and center play will make overcoming the dip in 3 point shooting challenging, to say the least.
Tough not to have the homer goggles at 9-0, I know, but I hope that Nolan can turn it on, as I view him as the guy who can make the difference between a sweet 16 and final 4. Brimah is too raw, Olander is too unathletic, and Facey is too skinny.
The only way I see us threatening a NC run is if Nolan can get to 8 and 8 a game, or thereabouts.
It can happen. Lamb sure made a rapid ascent in 2011.
But there is zero doubt in my mind that a NC run this year will be much, much more unlikely than 2011.
I guess I agree with Jay - barring a major change in one or more of our players, I just don't think we have the right distribution of talent on the team to go deep.

After how many years with ESPN, Bilas is all of a sudden becoming an ESPN personality???? I think not. Last year and many times in previous years he was highly complimentary towards UConn and actually hammered some of the longtime Dickie V favorites, showing a lot of class and balance. To say he's gone over to the dark side is a bunch of baloney. I'm not sure of his reasoning but he has more integrity than just about any other commentator in the game.I think you're probably giving him too much credit. Bilas is becoming more of an ESPN personality than a guy who puts in the work to know what he's talking about.
And we won. Yes, our center play is weak, and yet we win. Over and over. Against teams with big front lines. . . .

Merely offering the point that Bilas' suggestion that we are not title contenders is a rational position.
To be honest, I really don't have a problem with him not listing us as a contender per say. But the fact that he has an honorable mention list and intentionally leaves off a top 10 ranked team that is undefeated from even the honorable mentions list?
Almost seems like an insult to me.
To be honest, I really don't have a problem with him not listing us as a contender per say. But the fact that he has an honorable mention list and intentionally leaves off a top 10 ranked team that is undefeated from even the honorable mentions list?
Almost seems like an insult to me.
Not sure if people saw this, but get ready to feel the hatred.Not enough talent on the floor fellas - no reason to get chippy about ESPN, yada, blah, blah. Amazing how fan boards react when they feel their team is shorted. Bilas knows his stuff - it has nothing to do with performance thus far. This team is a ball to watch, they have some fun players, but they don't have the manpower to win a NC. The front court is still incredibly soft and you can't expect Nappier to put this team on his back every game in March. He's a nice player, but he's not that player. We know what we have with the personnel - no one is going to emerge off the bench and become a miracle sleeper, no one is going to develop into a lottery pick. Enjoy the year, but set the expectations properly. Hell, maybe this is a team that can get hot when it matters and pull off a win or two that we don't expect, but it remains a very flawed team that will struggle when it's facing the upper echelon/hyper talent.
So now that "the Cardinal" ate our God Damned lunch and made us look like in the process, do you feel a little less insulted? Because I saw a lot of things tonight, but one of them sure wasn't "one of the top 15 teams most likely to win the NC in March."To be honest, I really don't have a problem with him not listing us as a contender per say. But the fact that he has an honorable mention list and intentionally leaves off a top 10 ranked team that is undefeated from even the honorable mentions list?
Almost seems like an insult to me.
Onions - you're now eating your words. Somebody hasn't been paying attention, but it wasn't me.When that happens I'll believe it. Omar hasn't found his stroke yet and Boat is just getting hot now. I expect we will shoot well over 40% from 3 all year. . . . I'm not saying this team will get to the final four, I'm not saying they don't have glaring weaknesses, but saying they don't have a chance just shows you haven't been paying attention.
It's an insider thing, but here's the list
1. Arizona
2. Louisville
3. Syracuse
4. Mich State
5. Florida
6. Duke
7. Wisconsin
8. Ok State
Honorable Mentions: Ohio State, Kansas, Kentucky, Gonzaga, Oregon, Wichita State, and Iowa
My reaction:
![]()
Come on Bilas, I love ya but you gotta be kidding me with the Shockers and Hawkeyes on there over the 3-time king Huskies.
You're better than that, Bilas. You'll do better next time out.
So now that "the Cardinal" ate our God Damned lunch and made us look like in the process, do you feel a little less insulted? Because I saw a lot of things tonight, but one of them sure wasn't "one of the top 15 teams most likely to win the NC in March."
We're shooting 46% from 3 this year but you think that doesn't make us a tittle contender? In case you can't do the math that's like shooting 69% from 2. It's why we can still win with our play at the center position.