Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="ctchamps, post: 2689240, member: 37"] Last year’s class bolted same time as this year’s class. KO and Hurley both had to scramble. Hurley gets similar last second players as KO and the attacker’s of KO who criticized him for not having a plan say Hurley has a strategy and the players were a great get considering the time frame. They are both band aid classes at least at this stage. If this class does better the Hurley supporters will state it’s proof and the KO supporters will argue it’s KO’s players that this happened and so on. Same bs as arguments over the 2014 team only reversed positions. A person’s idea of apologista and making excuses depends on where we fall on KO. The need to deride things that bother us is the issue. As I pointed out many times there was a large chorus of posters who agreed with Chief that Dyson was a bad player because he never won an NCAA postseason game. It was just as ludicrous then as it is now. Over time that sour grapes position ended with most posters. The predominant position became we never would have lost to Syracuse in 6 OT and had a better chance of beating MS with a healthy Dyson. But that sentiment took a good three years to take hold because people blamed Dyson for the way his senior season played out. [/QUOTE]