ShakyTheMohel
Is it 11:11 yet?
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 8,832
- Reaction Score
- 20,905
Exactly. It was created by consultants....to fit some need.The methodology is flawed (likely by intent).
Exactly. It was created by consultants....to fit some need.The methodology is flawed (likely by intent).
No, it doesn’t say that at all since both of those teams are already in their respective conferences. If you were paying attention the, oh I don’t know half a million times those choices were discussed on the boneyard, you know the underlying reasons for them.So this says based on fanbase we sho have beatout Lville for an acc spot and RU for a B1G spot.
If Mora can field a competitive team sounds we are in a market where we can consistently fill the Rent and get TV eyeballs..
Hope that is true.
I have been paying attention for quite a while and lost hours I will never get back on the conference realignment board.No, it doesn’t say that at all since both of those teams are already in their respective conferences. If you were paying attention the, oh I don’t know half a million times those choices were discussed on the boneyard, you know the underlying reasons for them.
I am not a fan of 99% of the football teams I watch on TV and I am sure it is the same for a lot of people, so why would TV viewers be a good model to determine fans or fanbase?It should be a very easy calculation. Home game attendance + TV viewers = size of fan base.
If you wanted to add anything else to that, you could add annual merch sales from Fanatics.
Geography, alumni base and any other metric are irrelevant in determining the true fans base.
Rooting interest is irrelevant IMO. The more eyeballs a team gets, the more fans their brand has.I am not a fan of 99% of the football teams I watch on TV and I am sure it is the same for a lot of people, so why would TV viewers be a good model to determine fans or fanbase?
You have that backwards. The whole project is to determine the fanbase to maximize eyeballs. You are using the dependent variable to attempt to determine the independent variable. The goal of the fanbase sizes study was to determine which teams to put in the top slots for TV that would have the highest fanbase, thus maximizing eyeballs. By simply looking at eyeballs you would be taking teams that have previously been in the best time slots on the best networks and counting in order to determine who should be in the best slots on the best networks. Never mind the fact that looking at it that way would have expanded Cincinnati's "fanbase" something like 5 to 10 fold this year from last, which no one would say is anywhere near accurate.Rooting interest is irrelevant IMO. The more eyeballs a team gets, the more fans their brand has.
If you watch a lot of Alabama football, even if it’s because you “hate” Bama, you’re still part of their fanbase because you’re giving them your attention each week and they are making money off that attention…