UConn Football: The Bridge Year

[huskymedic]

BD chose or did not know how to follow that kind of scenario.

Or tried the transfer route and there were no ready options that fit into the holes needing to be filled.

 

[Husky25]

Addazzio did play to his strengths year 1 with Williams (and a great 5th year transfer on the OL) and he found quicker ways to fill holes with 5th year transfers (2 OL and Murphy). BD chose or did not know how to follow that kind of scenario. I believe he chose a path that enables building and is and may be continue to be willing to sacrifice wins for building. Is it right or is it wrong? Hopefully we know by the end of this year but most likely not until the end of next year.

Or he was unable, given the personnel.

Let's put into basketball terms.

Creighton was ranked in the low teens for most of the 2103-14season, led by Doug McDermott and Ethan Wagge. These two players graduate and Creighton falls to the bottom of the Big East in 2015.

Duke loses Jabari Parker and Rodney Hood and they win a National Title.

Creighton (hopefully) rebuilds. Duke reloads.

I am in no way saying the BC football is on the same footing as Duke in basketball. I went to extremes to illustrate my point. Diaco had some talent on last years team, but the team did not have the personnel as a whole that he could exploit.

 

[Carl Spackler]

Bob Diaco is the head coach, and it's his job to put a team together that can achieve success in #1 the classroom and #2 on the field in the AAC conference. He appears to have taken the past year to squarely address #1 successfully.

He was hired in December 2013, and as of Thursday evening Sept 3, 2015, he will have had essentially 20-21 calendar months on the job to identify and assemble a roster of 105 players, 85 scholarships, for kickoff that night, that fit both #1 and #2. He will have had 2 spring football sessions, 2 fall camps, and 1 full season of practice and game experience as a head coach in guiding his staff in running practices, developing game plans, and competing in games. The majority of his roster will have had at least one full off season strength and conditioning program, and most will have had 2.

On Thursday night Sept. 3 will play Andy Talley's Villanova 1-AA team. The game should be a fight early, but by the second half, we should be dominating them. Their quarterback should come away from this game beaten up and bruised, and their running game held to a very low total. Our offense should be efficient enough to maintain possession and advance the ball and gain first downs (NO TURNOVERS) - and disciplined enough not to be committing procedural and fundamental skill penalties (PLEASE NO MORE CHOP BLOCKS) and win the battle of the line of scrimmage on offense because of strength condition and recruiting of lineman and TE's and backs, and generate high percentage field position scoring opportunities. Then we need to score. The kicking game needs to cover kicks and punts effectively, and catch kicks effectively without turnovers. We do all of that, and this game should be over by middle of 3rd quarter - in our favor. Apologies to JMoney, but if we're relying on our own QB play to win this game - we are in trouble I think.

Following that - we get Army at home. The terrible triple option offense. That will be another fantastic test of where we are at as a coaching staff and a team, and once again, apologies to JMoney, but if we are relying on QB play again to win that game, we are in trouble. We shouldn't really need a great game from the QB position until week 3.

We will know a heck of a lot more about this team, and Bob Diaco as a head coach, by the end of week 2, than we learned all of last season - I think.

 

[CL82]

I just hope the fans have that kind of patience. Worst case is the revolving door.

No the worst case is continued 2 loss (or less) seasons, coupled with more tone deaf moments. Bob's got to show us something this year.

 

[Husky25]

No the worst case is continued 2 loss (or less) seasons, coupled with more tone deaf moments. Bob's got to show us something this year.

It is baffling to notice the number of people here who are not willing to give Diaco any benefit of any doubt. Even former "Coach" Pasqualoni had more support going into year 2.

 

[CL82]

It is baffling to notice the number of people here who are not willing to give Diaco any benefit of any doubt. Even former "Coach" Pasqualoni had more support going into year 2.

So you'd be okay with another 2 loss season, without any measurable improvement, Husky?
I'm guessing not, and I don't find it "baffling" in the least.

I'm 100% behind Diaco, (if UConn succeeds, he succeeds), but last year's performance coupled with occasional tone deaf comment (games as practices, phantom rivalries) has me worried.

 

[mets1090]

It is baffling to notice the number of people here who are not willing to give Diaco any benefit of any doubt. Even former "Coach" Pasqualoni had more support going into year 2.

The longer the team is irrelevant, the less rope the coach gets. If Diaco were to fail this year, people are going to want him gone. If the next guy fails in 2016, people are going to want him gone. Such is life in a fan base that has experienced greatness in most sports and had a football program with very good potential just 5 years ago.

 

[freescooter]

Not only is this meme old, it is patently false.

More often than not, BC has decent offensive lines. Addazzio rode a strong offensive line and running game in 2013 (you may remember that Andre Williams received an invitation to the Downtown Athletic Club?), and then combined the O-line with Tyler Murphy last year. UConn has not been able to put together either of those combinations since at least 2011.

Franklin's wins in year 1 were Elon College (5-6 FCS), UConn (5-7 and sinking), Ole Miss (2-10, scored 7 pts or less 5 times), Kentucky (5-7, scored 10 pts or less 6 times), Army (3-9), and Wake Forest (6-7). Combined record of Vandy's opponents in wins: 26-46, 0.361 pct.

In 2012, Vandy started 2-4 before going on a 7 game win streak against a down Auburn team (3-9), UMass (1-11), Kentucky (2-10), Ol Miss (7-6), Tennessee (5-7), not-as-spunky Wake Forest (5-7) and NC State (7-6). Combined record of Vandy's opponents in wins (including Presbyterian who was 2-9 in FCS): 37-72, 0.339 pct.

Just by virtue of playing in the SEC, Franklin had a better roster than what Coach Diaco inherited, but he didn't exactly lay the wood to the SEC either. Not for nothing but looking at Franklin's first year in the Big Ten, a case can be made that Franklin has been doing it all with mirrors. He did beat UCF (So did UConn), but his other wins were Akron, Rutgers, UMass, Indiana, Temple and BC. Good for him. I hope Coach Diaco fakes it until he makes it to a 6-6 record too, but Franklin is not exactly an apples to apples case study.

Yeah and Vandys schedule compared with Army, SMU, Tulane, South Florida, Albany? Please! And Vandy had had a history that makes Rutgers look like Ohio State. One yes one, winning season since 1983. Better roster my . Especially in relative terms. Plus note that we came within a boneheaded play by the other guys of going 1-11 and lost to a team that was so bad the didn't know how to line up in the "victory formation." And just to note Franklin may be doing it with mirrors but he wins the games he should win. We couldn't even do that.

 

[Husky25]

So you'd be okay with another 2 loss season, without any measurable improvement, Husky?
I'm guessing not, and I don't find it "baffling" in the least.

I'm 100% behind Diaco, (if UConn succeeds, he succeeds), but last year's performance coupled with occasional tone deaf comment (games as practices, phantom rivalries) has me worried.

Either you don't know what benefit of the doubt means or you are intentionally created a Nelson-level straw man argument. Nowhere in any of my 7,000+ posts (Holy crap, I need a life!!) do I even allude to that as being acceptable, but I also do not expect it, as so many on this board seem to.

What makes you think Diaco will have another 2 win season? Whether the QB is Bryant Shirreffs or Tim Boyle, does he not have an advantage over Whitmer, Cochran, or Boyle '14 in one more year experience under the coaching staff? Aside from center, isn't the o-line more experienced and don't the skill positions return pretty much intact from the end of last season?

Last year's performance has as much to do with 2015 as 3 wins at the end of 2013 had with last year. People expecting more of the same in 2014 so conveniently forget that 80% of the most important group on the field turned over and the team lost their primary QB after game 1. I also read somewhere that there was a coaching staff change too.

I expect improvement this year if for nothing else, but for the experience the individual players gained in the system and on the field, coupled with the strength and conditioning level of the team as a whole. Furthermore, I expect Coach Diaco to recognize what the strengths and weaknesses of his team, which he appears to have already done by changing up offensive coordinators. I do not expect to see a platoon at QB. I also do not expect to see Diaco lose 30% of his scholarship athletes before or during the season, nor to see players on the field who are not ready to be on the field. So absent evidence to the contrary (which fans will not get until at least September) I will interpret the situation in Diaco's favor, rather than to rail against him. Because conversely, If Diaco succeeds, so does UConn.

 

[Husky25]

What are you trying to say? This is HFD-style incoherent, but let's see if I can parse through this...

Yeah and Vandys schedule compared with Army, SMU, Tulane, South Florida, Albany? Please!

I assume you meant Stony Brook, who UConn beat last year and if you did not adjust your expectations for what the 2014 could do after the Temple game, then that is on you.

And Vandy had had a history that makes Rutgers look like Ohio State. One yes one, winning season since 1983.

Um, ok, but I'm unclear on what has to do with anything. Franklin beat Rutgers last year when he was coach of Penn State. According to the 2011, 2012, and 2013 schedules, the Commodores did not play Rutgers, let alone not beat them while Franklin was at Vanderbilt.

Better roster my . Especially in relative terms.

So Vanderbilt was playing with a broken 2nd string QB, behind a (more or less) makeshift offensive line and a roster with less depth than most Div. 2 schools?

Plus note that we came within a boneheaded play by the other guys of going 1-11 and lost to a team that was so bad the didn't know how to line up in the "victory formation." And just to note Franklin may be doing it with mirrors but he wins the games he should win. We couldn't even do that.

UConn was also were in striking distance going into the 4th quarter vs. Boise State, East Carolina, USF (despite the stupid game plan adjustment), and ARMY. I had to leave the SMU game because of a medical emergency, but UConn was winning when I left. There are no two ways around UConn being a bad football team last year so I am not sure what makes you think UConn should have won any of the games you mentioned. After Temple, I thought one, maybe two more tops. On the other hand, I did not think either one would be UCF.

I don't know what else can be said except that 2015 is a new season.

 

[ConnHuskBask]

Bob Diaco is the head coach, and it's his job to put a team together that can achieve success in #1 the classroom and #2 on the field in the AAC conference. He appears to have taken the past year to squarely address #1 successfully.

If you think UConn is paying Diaco $1.5M a year to have his priorities in that order, you're lost.

 

[Carl Spackler]

If you think UConn is paying Diaco $1.5M a year to have his priorities in that order, you're lost.

LOL, if you think that - then you should write a letter to the Pres, requesting that Bob Diaco return his salary from 2014 rather than writing a nonsense note on here.

 

[ConnHuskBask]

LOL, if you think that - then you should write a letter to the Pres, requesting that Bob Diaco return his salary from 2014 rather than writing a nonsense note on here.

Shed some light on how Bob makes academics his top priority then? Specific examples of what he's doing to ensure that success.

 

[CL82]

Either you don't know what benefit of the doubt means or you are intentionally created a Nelson-level straw man argument. Nowhere in any of my 7,000+ posts (Holy crap, I need a life!!) do I even allude to that as being acceptable, but I also do not expect it, as so many on this board seem to.

What makes you think Diaco will have another 2 win season? Whether the QB is Bryant Shirreffs or Tim Boyle, does he not have an advantage over Whitmer, Cochran, or Boyle '14 in one more year experience under the coaching staff? Aside from center, isn't the o-line more experienced and don't the skill positions return pretty much intact from the end of last season?

Last year's performance has as much to do with 2015 as 3 wins at the end of 2013 had with last year. People expecting more of the same in 2014 so conveniently forget that 80% of the most important group on the field turned over and the team lost their primary QB after game 1. I also read somewhere that there was a coaching staff change too.

I expect improvement this year if for nothing else, but for the experience the individual players gained in the system and on the field, coupled with the strength and conditioning level of the team as a whole. Furthermore, I expect Coach Diaco to recognize what the strengths and weaknesses of his team, which he appears to have already done by changing up offensive coordinators. I do not expect to see a platoon at QB. I also do not expect to see Diaco lose 30% of his scholarship athletes before or during the season, nor to see players on the field who are not ready to be on the field. So absent evidence to the contrary (which fans will not get until at least September) I will interpret the situation in Diaco's favor, rather than to rail against him. Because conversely, If Diaco succeeds, so does UConn.

Uh Husky, put the tampon back in and take a look at the actual posts:

1. 06029: I just hope the fans have that kind of patience. Worst case is the revolving door.

2. CL82: No the worst case is continued 2 loss (or less) seasons, coupled with more tone deaf moments. Bob's got to show us something this year.

3. Husky25: It is baffling to notice the number of people here who are not willing to give Diaco any benefit of any doubt. Even former "Coach" Pasqualoni had more support going into year 2.

4. CL82: So you'd be okay with another 2 loss season, without any measurable improvement, Husky? I'm guessing not, and I don't find it "baffling" in the least.
​

06029 said the worse case scenario was going through multiple coaches. My reply was in essence that last year's performance on a consistent basis would be worse. You chimed in complaining about people give Diaco no support. Now there's your "Nelson-level straw man argument" and it is in your post, not mine.

I didn't call for Diaco's firing, nor did I say he won't improve on last year's record. I did note that last year's results on a consistent basis without the administration trying to change anything would be worse. My response pointed out that you probably agree that sentiment. In your response, at least as much as I bothered to read, you confirmed that.

It's too early to be a knee jerk apoligista, at least to me. I'm rooting for Diaco to be successful, but I'd be lying if I said that the team's on the field performance and BD's tone deaf comments have me feeling confident right now. Hopeful, but not confident.

 

[rayrayfor3]

Calhouns first season UConn went 9-19. Different sport but same concept, these things take time

 

[CL82]

Calhouns first season UConn went 9-19. Different sport but same concept, these things take time

Good analogy since Calhoun says that he could have gotten more wins that year but it was a secondary goal to promoting long term program growth.

I suppose it is worth saying that it is far, far easier to build a basketball program than a football program. So it is probably unfair to keep that comparison going to Calhoun's next year which was a 20 win season and ended with Connecticut being NIT champs (equivalent for HCBD would be like what 8 regular season wins plus a bowl win?) or two years later when he won the conference and was national COY.

FWIW, I think Diaco was a good hire. The jury is still out as to whether he will be a good coach, but that's to be expected with only one season in the books.

 

[History Geek]

Calhouns first season UConn went 9-19. Different sport but same concept, these things take time

This.

 

[sportsart]

Diaco rebuild = Edsall rebuild.

 

[Husky25]

06029 said the worse case scenario was going through multiple coaches. My reply was in essence that last year's performance on a consistent basis would be worse. You chimed in complaining about people give Diaco no support. Now there's your "Nelson-level straw man argument" and it is in your post, not mine.

I didn't call the Diaco's firing, nor did I say he won't improve on last year's record. I did note that last year's results on a consistent basis without the administration trying to change anything would be worse. My response pointed out that you probably agree that sentiment. In your response, at least as much as I bothered to read, you confirmed that.

It's too early to be a knee jerk apoligista, at least to me. I'm rooting for Diaco to be successful, but I'd be lying if I said that the team's on the field performance and BD's tone deaf comments have me feeling confident right now. Hopeful, but not confident.

I don't think it is reasonable to conclude just yet that the Program is likely to perform like it did last year on a consistent basis, considering the circumstances.

I interpreted your: "Bob has to show something this year," as not giving him the BotD, like so many others. I think that Diaco actually had a method to his madness last season. The comments? Some could have been worded differently without losing the over all point. Others were taken out of context. C'est le vie. It's a new season. It's a different team and fully expect improvement until he shows me otherwise. For Pasqualoni, it was the Temple game in Season 2, which if I recall correctly, was a win!!

 

[Husky25]

Good analogy since Calhoun says that he could have gotten more wins that year but it was a secondary goal to promoting long term program growth.

I suppose it is worth saying that it is far, far easier to build a basketball program than a football program. So it is probably unfair to keep that comparison going to Calhoun's next year which was a 20 win season and ended with Connecticut being NIT champs (equivalent for HCBD would be like what 8 regular season wins plus a bowl win?) or two years later when he won the conference and was national COY.

FWIW, I think Diaco was a good hire. The jury is still out as to whether he will be a good coach, but that's to be expected with only one season in the books.

I recall a story that depicted a conversation between Calhoun and President Herbst. Calhoun said he could turn around a struggling basketball team with two good guards, but there are only 5 men on the basketball court at any given time. Football has more moving parts and requires more pieces. In the end, IIRC, he told Herbst to be patient. Manuel picked the right guy.

After re-reading some of your posts, CL, I think we may be in agreement. I regret (for lack of better word) the confusion earlier...

 

[FfldCntyFan]

Diaco rebuild = Edsall rebuild.

It also may equate to a George O'Leary rebuild (look at his first year at UCF). Also, those b!tch!ng about how we closed the season last year need to take a good look at how Memphis, in their second season with Fuente in charge closed he 2012 season. I would wager that many here saw their season ending game first hand.

 

[CL82]

I don't think it is reasonable to conclude just yet that the Program is likely to perform like it did last year on a consistent basis, considering the circumstances. Me either.

I interpreted your: "Bob has to show something this year," as not giving him the BotD, like so many others. I think that Diaco actually had a method to his madness last season. The comments? Some could have been worded differently without losing the over all point. Others were taken out of context. C'est le vie. It's a new season. It's a different team and fully expect improvement until he shows me otherwise. For Pasqualoni, it was the Temple game in Season 2, which if I recall correctly, was a win!!

I think we're in agreement.

The Bob has to show something comment is a fundamental truism. Have a bad year at work, well if you have a good track record you've got a good shot at surviving it. Have a bad year in your first year, you've got to show something in year two and show it fairly quickly. It doesn't have to be winning season, obviously, just progress. More cohesive play, the ability to score consistently, smothering D...something. That's how it is.

I think Diaco appeared to be a great hire, and I truly hope he does, but, like I said above, I'm worried because we can't afford another bad hire which would result in another restart.

We'll see soon enough. Nova is a tough enough test to give us a sense of the progress that has been made.

 

[J187Money]

Bob Diaco is the head coach, and it's his job to put a team together that can achieve success in #1 the classroom and #2 on the field in the AAC conference. He appears to have taken the past year to squarely address #1 successfully. He was hired in December 2013, and as of Thursday evening Sept 3, 2015, he will have had essentially 20-21 calendar months on the job to identify and assemble a roster of 105 players, 85 scholarships, for kickoff that night, that fit both #1 and #2. He will have had 2 spring football sessions, 2 fall camps, and 1 full season of practice and game experience as a head coach in guiding his staff in running practices, developing game plans, and competing in games. The majority of his roster will have had at least one full off season strength and conditioning program, and most will have had 2. On Thursday night Sept. 3 will play Andy Talley's Villanova 1-AA team. The game should be a fight early, but by the second half, we should be dominating them. Their quarterback should come away from this game beaten up and bruised, and their running game held to a very low total. Our offense should be efficient enough to maintain possession and advance the ball and gain first downs (NO TURNOVERS) - and disciplined enough not to be committing procedural and fundamental skill penalties (PLEASE NO MORE CHOP BLOCKS) and win the battle of the line of scrimmage on offense because of strength condition and recruiting of lineman and TE's and backs, and generate high percentage field position scoring opportunities. Then we need to score. The kicking game needs to cover kicks and punts effectively, and catch kicks effectively without turnovers. We do all of that, and this game should be over by middle of 3rd quarter - in our favor. Apologies to JMoney, but if we're relying on our own QB play to win this game - we are in trouble I think. Following that - we get Army at home. The terrible triple option offense. That will be another fantastic test of where we are at as a coaching staff and a team, and once again, apologies to JMoney, but if we are relying on QB play again to win that game, we are in trouble. We shouldn't really need a great game from the QB position until week 3. We will know a heck of a lot more about this team, and Bob Diaco as a head coach, by the end of week 2, than we learned all of last season - I think.

You have no idea how much I want to agree with you. I'm not being a pessimist. I will just believe it when I see it.

Btw I enjoy the experience either way. I don't like losing but it isn't going to keep me from coming to the games.

The only thing that will is outside obligations. Looks like my sons high school football schedule was designed specifically to keep me from the Rent.

 

[Duncan Idaho]

Diaco did what he hinted he was going to do; I have a fighter that is fat, weak, unconditioned and mentally undisciplined. He has to go 12 rounds. He wont be able to throw many punches because missing is going to wear him out. He will be covering up for most of the fight. We just got to get through this fight. We are going to be better prepared for the next one.
We are sorry, we felt we had to do this, here is a couple of hockey tickets and btw we are truly interested in your input on how to improve the game day experience.
No one is going to pay to see a fight where one of the combatants just covers up. He bought himself a year to get his guy in shape and learn some skills. Diaco can't coach like he did last year. Nobody will show up after the Army game.

 

[06029]

Calhouns first season UConn went 9-19. Different sport but same concept, these things take time

Not even close to analogous. BB can be impacted by 1 to 2 outstanding players surrounded by 5 to 6 adequate role players. In BB, the head coach has a much more dramatic impact as the interaction with all the players is constant. The coaching is constant. The imposing of the coaches will is constant and immediate.

FB, you need at least 15 to 20 adequate role and 2 to 3 outstanding players at the skill positions on both sides of the ball. Finding the 2 to 3 and not surrounding them with adequate during a season, they look ordinary. The head coach in FB has less of an impact as well since the day to day interactions and coaching of the players is up to the position coaches. While BD may interact with every player (and I am sure he does), his ability to impose his will is far less than any BB head coach.

Baby steps should be the expectation after the last few years. BD has done about as good a job as he can in setting the expectation bar fairly low. I hope he exceeds it.

 

[Carl Spackler]

Diaco rebuild = Edsall rebuild.

There are ways that this makes sense. Edsall had to take a team that was built to 1-AA conference recruiting standards under Skip Holtz and bring it up to 1-A conference standards. We had lots of really good players in the late 1990's under Skip Holtz, but it was a 1-AA roster and 85-63 = 22.

That's the difference between 1A and 1AA, a full 11 man squad on both sides of the ball for the depth chart to be recruited to play scholarship ball through NLI cycles. Given the state of the program in 2011 with a coaching change and a small class that needed to be large, with attrition, and then another coaching change, that kind of recruiting problem is similar to what Edsall had to do b/w 1999 and 2001.

 

[Carl Spackler]

You have no idea how much I want to agree with you. I'm not being a pessimist. I will just believe it when I see it.

Btw I enjoy the experience either way. I don't like losing but it isn't going to keep me from coming to the games.

The only thing that will is outside obligations. Looks like my sons high school football schedule was designed specifically to keep me from the Rent.

We are on the same page JMoney. I'm going to continue buying tickets, that's a given now. If I was going to stop, it would have been this year. I'll hold on to them like baseball cards I suppose, and hope they're valueable again someday. I'm in a tough spot with my family too. It's easy to justify going to games when they are good, and missing other stuff, but I've really had to work this season. Army and Navy are givens, as is opening day, but I will have a tough sell later in the season if things proceed like they did last year. My wife isn't going to put up with me going to games with my buddies and ending up turning it into what it turned into most of the time last year. The Cincinnati game was the last straw. Showing up at home, when I did, in the condition I did, after a 41-0 loss? I'll need better excuses to go out with my old buddies and do that again in the future. I didn't even know the final score until the next day. I think it was 33-0 when we left.

 

[Carl Spackler]

Diaco did what he hinted he was going to do; I have a fighter that is fat, weak, unconditioned and mentally undisciplined. He has to go 12 rounds. He wont be able to throw many punches because missing is going to wear him out. He will be covering up for most of the fight. We just got to get through this fight. We are going to be better prepared for the next one.
We are sorry, we felt we had to do this, here is a couple of hockey tickets and btw we are truly interested in your input on how to improve the game day experience.
No one is going to pay to see a fight where one of the combatants just covers up. He bought himself a year to get his guy in shape and learn some skills. Diaco can't coach like he did last year. Nobody will show up after the Army game.

The only thing I disagree with is the last line. Some people will show up for Navy.

 

[freescooter]

What are you trying to say? This is HFD-style incoherent, but let's see if I can parse through this...


I assume you meant Stony Brook, who UConn beat last year and if you did not adjust your expectations for what the 2014 could do after the Temple game, then that is on you.



Um, ok, but I'm unclear on what has to do with anything. Franklin beat Rutgers last year when he was coach of Penn State. According to the 2011, 2012, and 2013 schedules, the Commodores did not play Rutgers, let alone not beat them while Franklin was at Vanderbilt.



So Vanderbilt was playing with a broken 2nd string QB, behind a (more or less) makeshift offensive line and a roster with less depth than most Div. 2 schools?



UConn was also were in striking distance going into the 4th quarter vs. Boise State, East Carolina, USF (despite the stupid game plan adjustment), and ARMY. I had to leave the SMU game because of a medical emergency, but UConn was winning when I left. There are no two ways around UConn being a bad football team last year so I am not sure what makes you think UConn should have won any of the games you mentioned. After Temple, I thought one, maybe two more tops. On the other hand, I did not think either one would be UCF.

I don't know what else can be said except that 2015 is a new season.

Look Franklin went into the worst college football situation in the country, lined up and won 6 games in year 1, something nobody had done there since 1980s. If he had so much talent how come they won 2 to he year before and UConn ran them out of the building I might add. Before Franklin they had a worse history than Rutgers before Schiano. That was the point. This guy coming in and wins in year 1 in a place where there had been 1 winning season in 30 years I the SEC and you say he had a weak schedule. I thought UConn was set up to make a run in 2014 because we had a weak schedule. Maybe we win 6. Maybe we get lucky and get 7. It can be done. But not if you treat the first 4 games as pre-season, basically run up the white flag against USF and don't bother game planning for the rest.

 

[J187Money]

Diaco did what he hinted he was going to do; I have a fighter that is fat, weak, unconditioned and mentally undisciplined. He has to go 12 rounds. He wont be able to throw many punches because missing is going to wear him out. He will be covering up for most of the fight. We just got to get through this fight. We are going to be better prepared for the next one. We are sorry, we felt we had to do this, here is a couple of hockey tickets and btw we are truly interested in your input on how to improve the game day experience. No one is going to pay to see a fight where one of the combatants just covers up. He bought himself a year to get his guy in shape and learn some skills. Diaco can't coach like he did last year. Nobody will show up after the Army game.

Close.

But choosing not to punch when the guy leaves himself open or is dancing around the ring with his back to you is never a winning strategy. At least try.