- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 12,848
- Reaction Score
- 21,341
Different players are different player. It drives me nuts on the basketball board when guys try to claim player x is going to become a great player in the off season because Hilton did. Same thing applies here. This kid was a highly rated guy out of high school, but got buried at Oregon. Kind of looks like NAU brought in a slew of quarterbacks including a guy who had been there and threw for 14 tds with 2 interception and ran some, too. If you transfer someplace with a young incumbent quarterback, you best be much better. But the fact that Boyle did or did not struggle at EKU and UConn is just as irrelevant as the fact that Hilton Armstrong went from little used 5 foul guy to NBA prospect is to whether some guy on this years bench will be a first round draft choice next year. One could also say the last time we brought in a highly high school qb who was buried at his former school, he turned around and led us to the most high profile win in our history against his former school. Does that mean we’ll be whooping’ up on Oregon in a couple of years? Of course not.But I don’t get your point. Fine, ignore adjectives. Don’t have to call a kid terrible or great. But can’t we care about whether he’s going to help us win games rather than what he might be in his late 20s? Whatever you call Boyle, do I have to care that a young man who couldn’t help us win ends up as a pro?
We know just two things about this young man beyond that Mora wanted him. That he was highly thought of by recruiting services coming out of high school, and that he didn’t win the starting job at NAU. To me, the latter fact is more important than the former. Look, if Mora wanted him glad he came, and I hope he helps us be much better. But there is no reason to assume that a young man who was the back up at NAU is going to change our trajectory.