Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Da_Aisijimo_Gou, post: 2583063, member: 264"] Reasonable questions can absolutely be asked regarding some politically-appointed BOT members' credentials and those of some elected BOT members. One way to improve qualifications of the latter is for far more alumni to actually vote in BOT elections versus ignoring messages and ending up with results of some minimal-participant popularity votes. Historically, a few too many appointed BOT members have been the result of both parties' gubernatorial whims, favors, etc. Beyond most likely being far more professionally accomplished, higher educated, and well connected with national movers and shakers and prospective big-hanging donors than some potentially naive to ill informed individuals questioning Kruger's credentials, he's certainly well qualified, capable, and brings respected board experience to the table. Yup, the BOT and university could benefit from more Krugers, Naydens, et al. [/QUOTE]